• Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 months ago

    They’re welcome to it.

    As far as I’m concerned, this is the entire benefit of lemmy/piefed/etc… They can have their space, and any other instance can choose not to federate with them so we aren’t forced to listen to them, unlike the alternative, where an algorithm forces them into everyone’s face.

    Rather than telling them they don’t have the right to speak, we simply have the ability to shut our window and not listen to them.

    Let them bitch at each other.

    • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I disagree with them being welcome, if we have more fascists over here eventually we’ll get overrun. Best to shut that door immediately.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Them making their own space actually lets us much more easily reduce our exposure to them - without their space we get them everywhere and each of us have to ban such users individuals to avoid their poison, whilst if they’re congregated in a server we can just ban that server and/or its forums.

        In terms of the NAZI bar metaphor, this is more like the NAZIS setting up their own bar and congregating there rather than trying to take over other bars - everybody else can very easilly avoid even looking at the NAZI bar, much less going there and listening to them spreading their ideology - yeah, by default the sound of their activities does leak to the street, but in Lemmy we’re the ones who can chose to close the door, not them.

        Compare that with, for example, how the Zionists captured news@lemmy.world and even up to a level the server itself, by seeking moderation and admin positions there: subverting an existing large traffic forum and the biggest Lemmy instance is way much more pernicious than what the other kind of NAZI are doing by setting up their own - easily avoided - corner.

        • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You raise good points, but for me the issue is, the Nazis then still have their own bar. And that creates a hub for them to advertise, spread, and sow hatred. And eventually, to try to buy the owners of the media platform. This is the literal “embrace, extend, extinguish” playbook they’re using. Is that not a problem too? How could we combat it best?

          I think it’s better if we shut down their bar and bar them from even coming to any bar.

          They want to go to a bar? Either don’t be a fascist or shut up.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            They would have one either way - I mean, just look at Twitter, Reddit, FOX News. Even when there weren’t such NAZI spaces bought and paid for by billionaires, NAZIs had their own websites, mailing lists and whatever.

            Weakenning the freedom inherent to the Fediverse’s implementation just because the NAZIs might use it to create their own space is just indirectly constraining yourself because of the NAZIs, which IMHO is the opposite of what we should be doing.

            Would you defend changing HTTP(S) and HTML to somehow stop NAZIs using it because as they are now they can be used by NAZIs to spread their message? How about e-mail? How about pen and paper?

            You can’t just throw the baby with the bathwater “because NAZIs”.

            If you really want to stop NAZI messaging altogether you can’t do it by Technical means, you have to do it by Social and Political means - Laws Censoring NAZI messaging - and even there, look at Germany that does it and all they seem to have achieved is that the NAZI symbology is hidden whilst a large part of the NAZI way of things is widespread in society (hence the AfD success) and some elements of it are even shared by the majority (hence Germany’s very overtly race-justified unconditional support of a nation commiting a Genocide). De facto Germany’s banning of NAZIsm hasn’t stopped the kind of Fascism like in the US right now or the AfD there, were they use the NAZI propaganda techniques and share many ideological elements with the NAZIs but just don’t use NAZI symbols.

            • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Barring them from everywhere would be ideal, but if not that, barring them from as many places as possible would be good too. Billionnaires have too much power and they are the powderkeg, in my view, that enabled fascism. So imho, we need to reduce their numbers and wealth, redistributing it to everyone.

              I defend barring fascists everywhere, and not compromising the resilence of the fediverse to censorship from fascists.

              And as for social and political means… in Germany, the AfD has had fewer votes as a % of turnout, than what the Republicans got in the US. I think the real cure is to combat algorithms by the root, and to seize the power over them back to the left and anyone non-fascist (or not as insane).

              • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                I understand the feeling.

                I also look at it Logically and that yields a more subtle take.

                My point is that thinking that ANYTHING is acceptable to contain the NAZIs (even when it hurts the rest) is forgetting that the whole point of stopping the NAZIs is to protected everybody else and their freedoms.

                I’ll give you a parallel example: start by “Everybody should be thrown in Jail to make sure all criminals are in Jail”. Whilst it would work, this is obviously senseless. Once that’s accepted the discussion becomes “how far should we go to make sure criminals go to Jail” and onwards to “how many innocents wrongly in Jail is acceptable” and “how many criminals who evade Jail is acceptable”.

                All that is what lead to things like a Justice System with Presumption of Innocence, different sentences for different Crimes and an Appeals System.

                When it comes to stopping NAZIs the same reasoning applies - “ANYTHING is acceptable” is obviously senseless (killing all human beings would certainly stop the NAZIs, but I expect we both agree that it’s a bit too much) so the discussion is then moved to “how far are we willing to sacrifice the rest in order to stop the NAZIs”, which is the area of thinking anchoring my original point - if the NAZIs are contained (by their own choice, even), then maybe it’s not worth it to sacrifice the freedom of the rest by mangling the Fediverse if all that would deliver as a result is the near-zero impact outcome of barring the NAZIs from their own separate space in the Fediverse whilst they can still gather elsewhere.

                In my view by wanting that you asked originally, a far greater number of people than the number of NAZIs would sacrifice a lot for something that will make the NAZIs lose very little - or in other words your idea amounts to “throwing the baby out with the bathwater”.

                I don’t think that “lets’ fuck up what’s important for almost everybody in order to barelly inconvenience the NAZIs” is a wise position, even if I understand the impulse to “just fuck those sons of a bitch no matter what”.

      • nuggie_ss@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You have a very poor understanding of how the fediverse works if you think that’s true.

        You can always section yourself off from the instances you don’t like. If it just so happens that you’re sectioning yourself off from most of the fediverse, then that’s on you.

        • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Except that what I call for is a collective defederation from those fascists.

          The ones sectioning themselves off are the fascists by virtue of holding repulsive ideologies.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean “welcome” in the most generic, passive aggressive Canadian sense of the word. Shutting the door is exactly what the strength of federated/defederated social media is all about.

  • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Beware of what? It’s no different than any other instance and capable of being subscribed to, scrolled past or blocked.

    Stop advertising for them and let them have their federated echo chamber, just like the communists, socialists, leftists and others have.

  • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I sometimes forget just how many tyrants use this platform.

    The very purpose of the fediverse is to make censorship impossible as it’s decentralized, open source, and easily accessible to all. Meaning that anyone, anywhere can utilize these tools to launch their own platform on their own terms without fear of being censored. This applies to everyone, not just some.

    The very existence of this instance, which is clearly just a parody, is enough to send a good chunk of the freedom lovers here to quickly take the mask off and turn into Mao where they want to take down the instance, infiltrate it, and censor it. The fact they can’t is proof that fediverse is working as intended. I, for one, welcome people from all over to use the fediverse. Having a social media that’s controlled by the people instead of corporations is a big plus for me.

  • darthinvidious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    So are they not part of the fediverse if they don’t link up with other instances? 'Cause if not, then all they’re saying is they censor things too because they are part of the fediverse…

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      So being sexist towards a Canadian is a warn but being sexist towards an American is a ban?

      • OpenStars@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I presume they were attempting to clarify that the type of xenophobia that they most likely expected to see was directed at themselves due solely to their nationality.

        But you could test this by making xenophobic comments against both, and see what happens. Then perhaps make an alt and perform in reverse ordering.

  • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zoneBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    I hate how maga people call themselves patriots. They are the most unamerican people ever. Everything they stand for is in direct opposition to the America ideals.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    damn, i gotta check out that place later. i wonder how MAGA will interact with the fediverse. like, how can you be anarchistic and bootlicking at the same time?


    edit: this is hilarious.

    bootlicking: check ✅️

    “especially towards Americans”

    well, at least this one i can understand. Now i have to think about What the Turtle said to Achill, somehow.


    this gotta be a troll account. Why is there an “antifa” community on the https://maga.place/ instance?

  • NONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve always wondered why conservatives insist on coming to the fediverse when conventional networks are more appealing to them and their ideals nowadays. Or is that still not enough?

      • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Bingo. These are the same people who will say that most political violence comes from the left while removing a study showing the opposite: a study about a statistical trend that has been well known and documented for longer than I’ve been alive.

        They don’t care. Their beliefs shape shift to fit whatever is most expedient in the moment. They will openly lie to your face, without even trying to hide that it’s a lie while they smile and say they’re being honest. The people who gaslit the nation about project 2025 only to have cabinet members gleeposting about implementing it on social media.

        Truth is irrelevant and reality is an inconvenience. Hypocrisy is as dead to them as the corpse of civility they prop up whenever it suits their narrative.

        • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          They lie because they believe they’ll be part of the “in-group”, while in reality, they are going to be censored the moment their higher-up has the ability to turn on them without retribution.

          They are fools, but not to be underestimated.

    • potoooooooo ✅️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      When I was a conservative piece of shit, in my younger days, I had the most outlandish bumper stickers you can imagine. Probably more outlandish than you can imagine, actually, 99.9% likelihood. There were quite a few. I knew I was being an ass and I loved when it offended people, because I was miserable. Someone was paying attention to me. I was getting a reaction. I existed! Anyway, yeah, it can be as simple as “they get off on ruining your day cuz they’re miserable pieces of shit.” Speaking from experience.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Good job being less of a piece of shit and congrats on the happiness. Any advice for helping people out of there?

        • potoooooooo ✅️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Tl;dr version:

          Take mushrooms in Amsterdam, say “it’s not doing anything” and also take your sister-in-law’s portion (turns out everyone is going to bed so you’re on your own for this first psilocybin trip, which should make it easier to…)

          Cry for five to six hours, finally lose religion and 80-90 pounds (over next 6-12 months), get medicated for ADHD (not currently, but sure helps), continue occasionally microdosing and/or smoking pot until everything finishes clicking.

        • potoooooooo ✅️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Even if that baby thinks they can’t.

          I worry you’re right.

          That video is like a weirdly nostalgic confessional of my time in D.C. I was a huge piece of shit. Systematic theology book. Capitol Hill job. Little bitty bow ties. Speakeasies. Pork stuffed potatoes at Dixie Bones. People can change.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      They go everywhere because even if a bunch of people are like “fuck off nazis” there will be a few people that are like “oh hey you have some good ideas”.

      That’s why they’ve been recruiting online since the beginning of the internet. Capture whoever you can that’s sympathetic and keep bolstering numbers by any means necessary. Worked out pretty well for them

    • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Same reason why tankies don’t just move to China, or why some Canadians had Trump bumperstickers: the point is to take over and wield authority as a weapon. Of course they try to invade and pollute every space they can and muddy waters wherever possible.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If they get defederated, they just spin up a new instance and keep spreading their hate.

    • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      FOSS is for everyone. Not wanting to be dependent on big tech isn’t uniquely a leftist ideal, and it should be obvious by now that the political affiliation and community guidelines of big tech companies are entirely dependent on the current political landscape, not any moral values or held ideals, and can change at any moment.

    • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      What’s the problem of those right-wing dipshits having their own instance? I’m trying to understand this perspective you all seem to have here.

      Someone please elaborate the hesitancy of us accepting MAGA extremists having their own federated community?

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why would we want to talk to MAGA assholes who want to eradicate most of the userbase?

        They’re allowed to make an instance, the software can’t stop them. They’re not required to be federated with.

        Just like how you can say anything you want, you’re not required to have someone listen to it, or not have someone speak their mind about it back to you.

      • F/15/Cali@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because I don’t want to interact with them outside of very specific, and sporadic, questions. Their presence is an active detriment to me. Let them go back to truth social.

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Is your argument here that your preferred way to deal with cockroaches is to let them have the run of your house? Hard to red anything rose out of that, given the context.

            • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I need you to work on your reading comprehension and try again. Not going to spoon-feed you what I’m saying if you’re here asking me to spell shit out for you friend. Also this is not endorsement of said implications either.

    • geekwithsoul@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They don’t want their own spaces as much as making other people’s spaces are theirs too - aka “This is why we can’t have nice things”

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Is that really true though?

        When living in the US, it seemed American conservatives seemed mostly to be oligarch shills and with very shallow and performative beliefs.

        Mind you, I think there needs to be balance of sorts between left and right, competition to keep both sides honest. But this doesn’t apply to American “conservatives” who at least at the high level seemed to mostly consist of demagogues.

        The “marketplace of ideas” phrase is a perfect example of the theatrical and performative nature of American conservativism.

        • Don’t lie to urself we both know that both parties are just as corrupt and bought out by corporate interests. The lefts beliefs are just as performative. Empathy for all people unless they say words we don’t like. Gun violence is bad and we should ban all guns but its OK to shoot some people for their opinions.

          If the communists are to be tolerated so must the Nazis. Communism is responsible for more deaths than the Nazis their is no argument for one that does not also lend value to the other. I’m of the persuasion that both those ideologies are evil and wrong but those ideas must be combatted by rational discussion and the only way to do that is allow all to speek.

          I’m neither a conservative or a democrat. I’m in fact not even a fucking American twat. But I have beliefs that strongly align with both sides and beliefs that strongly oppose both sides. Only in the struggle between ideas can actual change happen. Only through challenging the mind can greater ideas be formed. Fuck the political parties its not a football game where we choose sides and cheer for the downfall of our opponents it as a philosophical dance of ideas where the best shall eclipse all teams.

          The marketplace of ideas is an idea it is a concept it is not consecrate it is not progressive it is its own thing and it requires all sides take part. Lemmy is a hard left echo chamber I would like to see lemmy represent the average person to grant all people a voice in the great marketplace of ideas. And to do this we need the rightwingers.

          • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I never said anything about US democrats (who are centre-right) or leftists. And where did I say you are American or even that you are a conservative or Democrat. Why are you bringing this up?

            I said something very specific, that US conservatives are beholden to oligarchs and even their alleged deeply held beliefs do not pass the basic smell test if you’ve lived in different countries / speak different languages and so on (this is true irrespective of you political views). It’s like claiming the United Russia party has deeply held beliefs. This is a ridiculous proposition.

            Making claims that “US conservatives support the marketplace ideas” is exactly the kind of thing that brings up massive red flags. Conservative/Progressive refers to broad political alignment. You can have people in both camps who support the marketplace of ideas and those that don’t. You can also have people who like to make statements about supporting the marketplace of ideas for superficial reasons.

      • barooboodoo@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hey Jimmy Kimmel, how do you like that marketplace of ideas? I heard conservatives sure do value that marketplace. Why can’t I hear you Jimmy?

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve noticed a significant uptick in rightist trolls on the fediverse since the devil called Charlie Kirk home. Absolutely nowhere is safe from fascist infiltration for long. Hopefully the half decent instances defederate from those cesspits en masse.