

And when it’s once again found that they only censor left-of-center speech, what then?
And when it’s once again found that they only censor left-of-center speech, what then?
I have conflicting feelings about this whole thing. If you are selling the result of training like OpenAI does (and every other company), then I feel like it’s absolutely and clearly not fair use. It’s just theft with extra steps.
On the other hand, what about open source projects and individuals who aren’t selling or competing with the owners of the training material? I feel like that would be fair use.
What keeps me up at night is if training is never fair use, then the natural result is that AI becomes monopolized by big companies with deep pockets who can pay for an infinite amount of random content licensing, and then we are all forever at their mercy for this entire branch of technology.
The practical, socioeconomic, and ethical considerations are really complex, but all I ever see discussed are these hard-line binary stances that would only have awful corporate-empowering consequences, either because they can steal content freely or because they are the only ones that will have the resources to control the technology.
The guy stomps on innocent, unsuspecting little turtles and occasionally burns them alive. Of course it should be flagged.
He now literally meets the exceptionally narrow definition of treason as defined by the US Constitution.
Sorry, someone already “owns” that land. Your home is prison now.
303 natives were convicted and sentenced to death following the Dakota War of 1862. Lincoln actually commuted the sentences of 264 of those natives, allowing the convictions to stand only for those he believed personally engaged in the murder of innocent women and children.
Therefore, the last one is deliberately and intentionally misleading.
The Lincoln one isn’t fair. After the Dakota uprising, the court sentenced HUNDREDS of natives to death for the murder of almost 500 settlers, including women and children. Lincoln commuted the sentences of almost all the convicted natives, save for the ones that personally murdered women and children.
This is the perfect waterfall analogy.
The difference is that we’ll just be running small, specialized, on-demand models instead of huge, resource-heavy, all-purpose models. It’s already being done. Just look at how Google and Apple are approaching AI on mobile devices. You don’t need a lot of power for that, just plenty of storage.
There’s no need for huge, expensive datacenters when we can run everything on our own devices. SLMs and local AI is the future.
This reminds me of some stuff in Charles Stross’ Accelerando. The book mentions how AI was rapidly filing patents and lawsuits and all this stuff by itself constantly. It was terrifying as a fictional idea, but here we are, it’s real.
In the US, reporting on simple facts makes you “radical left” while obvious propaganda makes you “right leaning”.
“…illegal protest…”?
Oh right, the US Constitution doesn’t exist any more.
The point of DEI is to overcome bias. If you are hiring, and you have a white guy and a woman of color, and the woman is a better choice, are you actually able to recognize that fact or will you be biased in favor of the white guy without even realizing it? And yes, the “without even realizing it” is literally the most important part, and the reason DEI programs/training are necessary.
So being “hired as a DEI” means you were hired for your qualifications despite being at a disadvantage due to social biases, and being “fired as a DEI” means you were likely the victim of overt discrimination.
This has been discussed before, and not just on the fediverse. It’s a bad idea because anything can be spun as “political” meaning rampant abuse.
Are you talking about the vast majority of people who call themselves “christian”?
…prepping his new extraction RPG for early access, but he’s not too worried about its launch because he reckons Steam’s algorithm is “impenetrable,” and as long as the game is good it’ll get in front of the right people.
“…extraction RPG…”
Oh no. Oh no.
Just stay far, far away from their forums.
That would be great. It would make it a lot easier to convince people to try Ubuntu.
And with that, I’m out. He’s literally doing the very thing he’s been accusing others of doing.