[…] I asked the man behind the counter if the Steak Nuggets were such a hasty retreat because they were unpopular with his diners. He said the following: “Well, we were one of the last stores to have those things, because nobody bought ’em.”

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s the next obvious step in the burrito nihilism movement. First we ate burritos and tacos and the world made sense. Then everyone decided burritos were too convenient and portable so they started getting deconstructed burrito “bowls.” Then carbs were bad so they removed the rice. Now we are in the final act, where they also remove the vegetables, cheese and sauce. Because nothing matters, life has no meaning and the world has gone mad.

  • Nomorereddit@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’ve ate the Chipotle cup of chicken last night. Not bad, shared some w my pitbulls.

    I had the fresh meat nuggets from chik fila two days ago. Not bad, not great.

    I don’t order this, but if my wife is bringing home slop from those stores…this is all ill tolerate.

    99% of food is tastier, cheaper and more nutritious home cooked. That’s not new.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This reminds me of the “Big Gulp” 64oz of soda for 0.99 days - basically when sugar was replaced with HFCS and the price of soda syrup fell through the floor.

      We’ve been automating factory production of chicken and pork for a while now, gotta sell it somewhere.

  • AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I eat more fast food than anybody I know.

    I tried the Arby’s steak nuggets for science. They were absolutely abysmal and I cannot understand what morons let them become a menu item. They are easily in the top five for the worst fast food item I have ever had in my entire life.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      My grandmother ate Wendys daily, as her only meal of the day, for 20+ years, she lived to 99. She’s unusual (and she also controlled her calorie intake so she didn’t become overweight.)

      Your mileage will most likely vary, that stuff isn’t healthy. Oh, by the way, her mother chewed tobacco to age 96 and lived to 98 - also not typical.

    • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They could have had country fried steak nuggets with soy protein to bind it together and it would have been killer. This was food waste with a glaze.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        This was food waste with a glaze.

        You mean BBQ sandwiches? I worked at a Rax (like Arbys, with a salad bar) - the meat scraps and leftovers were thrown in a tub, covered in sauce, stuck in the cooler and sold as BBQ for the next day or so.

        • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Quite possibly actually.

          Wendy’s gets away with it for their burger to chili. I’m not actually sure what Arby’s is sourcing these from, but it just wasn’t great.

  • the_q@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Beans are a better protein source because you get fiber too and fiber is really the thing people lack in their diet. Also, no living creature is harmed in the process.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      no living creature is harmed in the process.

      Everything annihilated by aerial spraying, and the creatures (including farm workers) dying of cancer from non-lethal doses, would beg to differ.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah, there’s nothing we can do that literally harms no living creature. Any vegan who has given their choices a second of thought will acknowledge that it’s about harm minimization, not causing zero harm.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I wish everybody would get more “precise with their language” instead of running around spouting “zero harm” “absolutely no suffering” and such things, because people who say that often enough start to really believe it - instead of having a second of thought.

          • Carl@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 minutes ago

            True. But when someone is behind a keyboard, they can double down on their stupidity.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Beans are great, but you need to eat 7 cups of beans, ~1.75 Litres of beans to get 100g of protein.

      Even if you’re vegetarian there are better sources of protein then that.

      • the_q@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Tell me you’re influenced by social media without telling me you’re influenced by social media.

          • the_q@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Does the can of beans tell you you need 100g of protein? Musta missed that…

            • howrar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought you were questioning the nutritional density of beans.

              In any case, I haven’t done the literature review on this, but just based on literature I’ve encountered on the matter (ranging from scientific papers to pop-sci articles), everything that recommends a lower intake also specifies that they’re recommendations for the average sedentary person. If you have any sources to share that contradict this, please do share. I think I’m going to do a proper lit review on this soon, so it’ll be a good addition.

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I could probably handle a handle of beans in a day, but I’m not sure if it’ll go as well if I keep forgetting to pour out the vodka before beaning the handle

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Nobody needs 100 fucking grams of protein in one day, even if you’re exercising you’ll still shit half of that out because your body can’t absorb that much.

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The standard Daily Recommended Allowance for protein intake is ~0.83g / kg body weight. I.e. that is the minimum amount of protein you need to eat every day to maintain your basic nutrition, which for a 180lb person is about 70g of protein per day, at minimum.

          You need more it you’re an older adult, and you need close to double that if you’re an athlete trying to gain muscle.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Can we talk about insoluble fiber for a second?

      A discount grocery store near me had 3 for $1 turnip greens. I ate then all over two days along with some homemade chicken stock I needed to use. What came out of me the next day was some kind of lovecraftian sleep paralysis demon. But holy shit have I been feeling great ever since! I sleep easier and longer, more energy throughout the day without a mainline of caffeine, and I think I’ve actually lost some weight dispite not actively trying to!

      Y’all mfers need Jesusfiber!

      • Bosht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’ve honestly wanted to do a cleanse maybe this will be the trick. Plus I’ve always wanted to meet my lovecraftian demons, so added bonus!

        • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Homie, I cannot describe how happier I’ve been since then! I mean, I know gut micro biota contribute to mental wellness. But the difference is fucking stark for me!

          Also I am not a doctor or professional! Do not think this is some sorta miracle cure! It just happened this way for me, ymmv.

      • the_q@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Oh snap he got us, boys! Give this guy a podcast and a position in the Trump administration!

      • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I dunno if we can call them creatures. Considering a creature is almost universally considered an animal, it is at least considered motile.

        • xeekei@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Neither are chickens when I eat their unfertilised eggs, but vegans still complain.

          • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            That’s because the chickens in factory farms are kept in squalid conditions that have them attempting suicide by autophagia if they aren’t debeaked!

              • the_q@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                They’re still killed when no longer of egg producing age and the males are ground up at sexing.

              • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                That’s a lot better, but I have a secondary concern I didn’t want to clog the above comment with. It’s that chickens as they exist today shouldn’t really exist. They’ve been bred to the point that the daily periods destroy their bodies. It’s not healthy. It’s like the problem with pugs, we should have left them alone, and now that they’re like this, it’s our responsibility to breed them back to health. Continuing to breed more with these health problems is an act of abuse in itself.

                • MangoCats@feddit.it
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  It’s some better, not a lot if you research most of the sources for those packages that say “freeroaming.” The only way the minimum standard for “freeroaming” labeling looks good (and, face it, no profitable operation does more than the minimum required) is by comparison with the factory hell-houses.

            • MangoCats@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              And here’s the hard to reconcile thing: if everybody did their absolute best effort, investing 5 hours a week in the family or local cooperative chicken farm to get their eggs, and nobody bought mass produced eggs anymore, salmonella and other disease deaths would skyrocket. Not that everybody who raises chickens for the eggs gets salmonella, just that modern rates are so low - a return to individual farming would see them rise 10x, maybe 100x - even with conscientious chicken ranchers.

              Now, get real about how much effort most people would actually put in on personal chicken-egg operations if they had no mass produced options and you’re looking at 1000x increases…

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Define harm. If a pig is born and raised by a meatpacking operation, there’s a pig that would never have been born without the meatpacking operation - if it is raised and slaughtered humanely (which they aren’t, these days), is it harmed? If people are starving due to shutdown of all inhumane meatpacking operations, have we reduced overall harm?

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Can I get a great big cup of cancer please, and fries, with with a cup of fizzy flavored HCFS, no ice. Thanks.

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I swear this push for protein (and they seem to specifically fixate on animal-based) is like they’re trying to do a speedrun climate collapse.

  • crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Ten or so years ago in fitness circles, the “hack” was to go to Chipotle and get just a double serving of steak a la carte. It was a cheap way to get a really good amount of protein when you were out.

    Can’t have anything without capitalists running it into the ground for profit.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Mfers wanna pretend like a well cooked cut isn’t a decent meal in and of itself, at least after you’re fully grown. I love me some veggies, but a chicken thigh ain’t nothing to sleep on!

  • ignirtoq@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I want to start by saying I generally agree with the theme of the article that the average American already gets enough protein without needing to specifically target it in fast food. However, I think this is not entirely accurate:

    Overall recommendations have consistently hovered between 50-70 grams [of protein] per day, depending on weight.

    That sounds low to me. I’ve seen nutritionist recommended minimums in the 50-70 range depending on weight, height, gender, and age, but recommended targets are higher. Especially for older men who are at higher risk of muscle loss with age, these recommended targets can be above 90 grams.

    Edit: Getting several down votes, so let’s add some sources.

    0.8g per kg of weight, which comes out to about 55g per day for a 150 lb person, is a minimum, not an average: https://doi.org/10.3945/an.116.013821

    Aging men may need to consume as much as 2g per kg of weight, which comes out to about 135g for a 150 lb man: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10030360

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The issue here is that the entire conversation has been hijacked by tryhard fitness influencers selling protein supplements, so people are just tired of the “protein bruh. Protein” conversation entirely.

      • ignirtoq@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah, I can understand that. I’m not in that space, so I wasn’t aware. A similar craze happened for removing gluten from one’s diet about 10-15 years ago, and after the hype died down a lot of the new options it spawned stuck around, which was great for people with celiac disease. Hopefully there will be a similar silver lining once this hype passes.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The real problem is so many different recommendations, but ….

      I do see a higher amount consistently recommended as you get older, but never in the same sentence as exercise. I’m well past the age and weight where it takes intentional action to maintain muscle mass, and I really need to start doing that.

      The algorithm started feeding me “Tai chi for older men”, so even that is telling me to exercise

    • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Athletes need 1.2 to 2 g per kg of bodyweight per day. The amount you need depends on your goals, are you trying to grow and perform, or just survive and subsist like the average sedentary Lemmy user.

      • Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Ain’t nobody eating 2kg of protein per day.
        You probably meant 1.2 to 2 grams per kg of body weight.

        And don’t make fun of us lemmy users, some of us actually get up out of chairs sometimes.

    • alyqz@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They taste like reconstituted jerky. Somehow both dripping wet and dry at the same time.

    • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      No.

      I can’t eat chicken, so I was excited to try beef nuggets.

      It was awful. I regretted every bite. It’s rare for me to turn my nose up at food, but I was tempted to try to see if I could return it.

      Since that’s a terrible thing to do, I sucked it up and ate the stuff. Never again.

        • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I wanted to try this and decided I didn’t like it isn’t a great reason to ask for a refund from the workers. I should have used their corporate number to explain what a terrible choice the food was. The worked already feel exploited and won’t send the feedback I desire.

          • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            The workers don’t care though, unless it is really busy. You’re not eating into their paycheck or inconveniencing them any more than anyone else waiting in line at the register.

            I agree to, returning because you didn’t like it is a terrible thing to do.

            But that is different from returning it because it is actually gross.

            • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Having been on the other side of the counter, it depends. Some people get really upset and defensive as if they have ownership of the brand and this will personally lead them to ruin. Others are like you suggest. I can be a bit of a jerk and don’t ask for refunds or replacements unless the order is wrong or the food has something wrong with it.

              In my head, it was my fault for not understanding what the menu item actually was, so if I didn’t like it then that was on me. The people to complain to are the ones on the receipt who actually solicit feedback.