

The second one. It’s funny that people think this is an absurd suggestion, too.
The second one. It’s funny that people think this is an absurd suggestion, too.
deleted by creator
Idk about “involves” but the ones centered on money certainly
LMAO
Who profits from that? Just a bunch of dirty poors.
Which part confuses you specifically? I can’t understand your complaint here. “No kids need to focus everything on money because simply enjoying life won’t change the world (nothing ever will)”??
Honestly no worse than any other popular Western capitalist in the late 20th century.
Seeing as position is relative, why not?
I’d be lower right if I had that dope cone hat
The military budget alone is in the trillions and they’ve apparently never “wasted” or “lost” a cent.
Then pretend he forgives us for killing him.
I definitely have impulsive tendencies
Smh if you didn’t want a stranger to profit off your basic human needs you should’ve been born rich, duh
Nope. I’m just saying they’re all “man-made”.
Right sure, when the British intentionally abuse Ireland and India it’s really just a whoopsie-daisy.
So it’s less of a natural disaster and more of an economic disaster? I wonder why people would blame governments for that…
Why is it the rich never starve if it’s just a totally unaccountable natural disaster?
I’m my golden socialist utopia online platforms would flourish freely with each new conversation.
“If we don’t do what they say they’ll bring the entire economy to a halt, yes this is the best most flawless system imaginable” is definitely an objective and emotionless assessment and not ideological cowardice.