If you don’t agree with the concept of good or bad people, you dont have to answer just down vote. If you think a person is good or bad based on where they were born and live you don’t have to answer just down vote.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yep. Real fucking easy answer for me.

      If someone tells you a story about how they lost their dog, if that person tries to one-up them, dismiss them, or hurts them… They’re a bad person. No negotiation.

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s all about empathy. If they lack empathy or kindness then fuck them. I don’t want them in my life and I prefer not to interact with them.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    If they lie all the time, they are probably willing to do other awful things as well.

    If they are willing to steal outside of a desperate situation, if they treat someone who’s been good to them awful, if they treat those beneath them awfuly, if they judge based on location, race, etnicity, etc. If they put whatever fantasy world they live in, over reality (antivaxxers and such, and yes religious people).

    If they co-operated with Jeffrey Epstein, they only belong in the woodchipper.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Antivaxx mom let’s baby die of mumps, because God wanted us to live (and die) natural lives, India citizen drinks infected, dirty lake water, because “holy water can’t be dirty”.

        Ok, so you found some way to cope with life, and you believe in some deity or whatever, that’s a you thing. But then, you start getting people killed over what is a belief, when you can clearly see with your own eyes that it is not working.

        Was it really worth it?

  • Count042@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    One of my tests as I’ve grown older is whether or not that person is capable of treating someone else’s children as their own.

    Both my father and step father did, so I didn’t realize how rare of an attribute this is, nor did I realize how evil not having this attribute can make some seemingly good people behave.

  • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Most people are good. Most people forget to be kind to others sometimes.

    Some people forget to be kind to others more. I kinda don’t like that.

    Some people need to cause others discomfort to feel like they are in control of their lives. I dislike that.

    Some people feel that they have the right to or even should cause others discomfort because they have some kind of birthright granted by their religion, how aggressive their ancestors were, or some perception that they’ve worked harder than others. I feel that such people should either be rigorously reeducated or in some way removed from access to other humans entirely.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    two things.

    1. how they treat other people
    2. what they don’t say

    first one is pretty easy. don’t treat other people like pieces of shit, or you’re a piece of shit.

    second one, when they see something happening that is wrong and do nothing. you’re a piece of shit.

  • Scuzzm0nkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    How people behave towards animals is a really big one for me. If someone doesn’t like cats or dogs or any sort of critters for any reason other than a traumatic childhood attack memory I assume something is deeply wrong with them. I realize plenty of bad people don’t hate animals, but I assume if you do then you can’t be good.

  • baller_w@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    The book “Sapiens” does a good job framing this. Humans are social creatures. Our social groups define their own norms, mores, values, etc. To be “good” is to align with those values. Clashes happen when groups with vastly different values interact. The old adage “if you were born where they were born, and you were raised how they were raised, then you would believe what they believe” applies here, even though this isn’t always true.

    The Internet makes this problem more stark. Our groups aren’t based on location anymore; our neighborhood, our school, our church. We can find our group(s) that align with and reinforce us any time we want. It’s also upset the typical way we define our values, and our society is struggling to catch up.

    So long way of saying, good or bad relies on context and the values of those you’re close with.

    But fuck people who don’t return their shopping cart. They’re just plain bad.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Everybody has the capacity to be an asshole once in a while. To asshole is human.

    But in general, people who go out of their way to stir shit up, or be an asshole/intentionally rude about something, then play the victim when they get called out for being an asshole. Waste of fucking space and energy. Just go live on a fucking island with all the other passive aggressive assholes.

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I also find it important to consider what they think of as “benefitting themselves”.

      If good vs bad is dependent upon their actions, then someone extremely selfish can be seen as “good”, just if they have enough ability to think long term and desire a future that would end up making them act “good”.

      If good vs bad is dependent upon their thoughts, then good luck finding out what people think. What they say will be completely different from what they think and a lot of them just realise they can easily get away with contradicting themselves as long as they do so in front of someone powerless.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Heh. I assume everyone is a bad person unless they immensely prove that they aren’t. they can’t do lots of drugs, lead chaotic lives, be anti-intellectual, be a gossip, be greedy, a control freak, have an immoral job, use religion as a cudgel, have no integrity, be overly optimistic, have lots of kids, etc. etc.