I’m active in circles associated with FSF and I often hear them saying research or academic software or programs must be licensed under GPL to prevent the work from being used in proprietary software.
But as a researcher I think that’s just involving politics in scientific work. I like BSD or MIT for research because it gives more flexibility for the users to use my work in anyway they see fit.
I think restricting my research work removes the point of it if it can’t be used freely by any person for any kind of work.
What do you people think?
Because they refers in english to more than one person. Using it for a single person is confusing.
Oftentimes, I can deduct the amount of people from the context but not always and oftentimes you need a lot of context to understand if it is plural or singular.
I simply think that, for me, refering to a generic singular person with a singular gender word is more important than using a generic gender word which is plural.
If someone else wants to use they, she can, but currently not me because everyone understands what I am talking about. It’s just a shortcoming of the english language and is far from valuing males more than females.
Btw: when publishing professionally, I always use “she” because that balances someone using he.
It’s not like singular they is a particularly new thing. And you could have the same issue of plurality being ambiguous with the word ‘you’, but people seem to be able to figure it out.
Just because there is already a singular and plural “you” doesn’t justify doing the same mistake again.
Bold of you to deduce the natural evolution of a language is “a mistake.” Next you’ll tell me the sun ought be a little more to the South when it sets, too.
Why do you want to use “they” and not a new term? Something that is not ambiguous
I’m partial to adapting ‘hen’ from Swedish as singular they, or ‘hän’ from Finnish as a singular pronoun for people which doesn’t indicate gender at all, but I use ‘they’ in English as it’s more widely understood.
I like that
singular they has been in widespread use for centuries, you are fundamentally incorrect
Just because someone used it in the past, doesn’t justify using it today either. It’s like “we have to do it because it’s our tradition. It’s what our ancestors did”. That’s just not right.
We are (re)defining it nowadays and some people choose they and some do not (yet).
I’m in favor of a new word, I’m not sure why you want me to change. I simply say that it is a process, it is evolution, and we will see what wins in the future.
Why do you want me to change? Just be the example you want to see and either I like it and adapt it in the future, or I don’t.
In the long run the children determine the outcome anyway which means our teachers (or nowadays tiktokers) decide what will stick.