• Meron35@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Most circuit boards are an absolute pride parade. You have your male to male/female to female connectors, MtF/FtM transformers, master/slave setups, multiport adapters, splitters, switches, docking, etc

      • stephan262@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I quite agree. Personally I use Main/Secondary, I find it does away with the problematic terminology while needing no changes in acronyms.

        • DarthFreyr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Eh, I think master is used (AFAIK) unproblematicly in other contexts like a master key, recording master, and master pattern. Converting it to “main” seems like a change or loss of meaning, but the problem may be that there is not really a consistent meaning across electronics usage to start with. I think “secondary” has some connotation of filling the same purpose or type as the primary, which doesn’t really fit for m/s usage. Master/sheep is my most similar option that keeps the “m/s”, but it feels awkward enough to draw attention to what it replaces. Could just do master (or main) and sub, where “sub” could mean substitute, subordinate, subscriber, [submissive,] etc. as needed.

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I like parent/child. Add something? Parent adopts. Remove something? Parent abandons, leaving the process or component with trauma that will require years of therapy.