• ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s the classic:

    “It’s grade school biology!”

    “Okay, but when you get to middle school…”

          • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            As someone who has experienced Post graduate biology, at that point explaining some things does reach the level of “trust me bro” when speaking to people that have no baseline biology knowledge.

            Do you want a series of 1 hour lectures and a few thousand pages of reading material? No? Then you just need to trust the experts.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Another perfect example of flawed analogies and kneejerk conclusions vs. the benefit of thinking about it for a few seconds

  • Meron35@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Most circuit boards are an absolute pride parade. You have your male to male/female to female connectors, MtF/FtM transformers, master/slave setups, multiport adapters, splitters, switches, docking, etc

      • stephan262@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I quite agree. Personally I use Main/Secondary, I find it does away with the problematic terminology while needing no changes in acronyms.

        • DarthFreyr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Eh, I think master is used (AFAIK) unproblematicly in other contexts like a master key, recording master, and master pattern. Converting it to “main” seems like a change or loss of meaning, but the problem may be that there is not really a consistent meaning across electronics usage to start with. I think “secondary” has some connotation of filling the same purpose or type as the primary, which doesn’t really fit for m/s usage. Master/sheep is my most similar option that keeps the “m/s”, but it feels awkward enough to draw attention to what it replaces. Could just do master (or main) and sub, where “sub” could mean substitute, subordinate, subscriber, [submissive,] etc. as needed.

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I like parent/child. Add something? Parent adopts. Remove something? Parent abandons, leaving the process or component with trauma that will require years of therapy.

      • _stranger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think that’s for token ring. I remember using an adapter to plug Ethernet into a wall version of one of these. Massive things.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          So it’s just a fucky old school data connector? That actually makes some sense, given how old Ethernet cables are these fuckers probably date back to when ribbon cables were the standard for connections, like that bastard radio shack computer from 1979 that I have.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      hot damn. I once lived in a house that used a contraption like this to feed elctricity from one circuit into another. I didn’t know and I touched one end… I did fall off the ladder, but I’m still alive.

      Of course this analogy is even more flawed than OOP’s.

    • Kobibi@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Can I ask, what’s the (ill-advised) use case for this?

      I don’t know anything about electronics but I readily believe this is a dangerous cable

      But what I don’t get is what people want it for. I’ve never been in a situation that calls for this

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        It allows you to move power from a live circuit to a dead one by connecting the outlets between them. The most common use I’ve seen is to easily hook a gas generator to a household circuit during a blackout.

        But yes, they’re very dangerous and there are less-stupid ways to hook up a generator that won’t make tripping over a power cable lethally dangerous or risk burning down the house by bypassing the circuit breaker and overloading the wiring in the walls.

        But this one is popular because it can be done very quickly and easily with minimal supplies.

      • Soybean@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        They can be used to hook a generator to your house if your power goes out, but people will use them for things like if they strung up Christmas lights backwards so 2 female ends are next to each other.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Another example where this argument falls flat is spaceship docking connectors, which are genderless so they can all dock to every other one.

    In space being heteronormative is less useful.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Shamefully, when I’m speaking to someone who starts spouting the usual nonsense about homosexuality or genders, I’ll ask " What about bears? ". I know nothing at all about bears, but seemingly its a great question to flounder moronic confidence. If it isn’t enough, I’ll add that bears display LGBTQ+ varieties in the wild and in zoo’s. Deapan / confused delivery is key!

    • daellat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I have read a bit about biology and the science is kinda clear cut on it. That is to say, sex is a false dichotomy. Not even the chromosomes are a deterministic 100% guarantee for other things like genitals, breasts and even “male/female normatieve brain patterns”. So yeah, follow the science and discover biology is not binary.

      • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Definitely going to try to add that to my “What about bears” question for future use. Much appreciated. I’m not certain that many recipients of my challenge will understand the words. I may be on a witchcraft charge in some places

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Do you have penguins in your bears question? They can form monogamous same sex bonded pairs that can adopt an egg from another couple and raise it.

          That’s a fun one to fuck with 'phobes about

          • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            snails are hermaphroditic, impale each other with sex arrows, and then proceed to twist around each other while hanging from a rope of slime and they impregnate each other.

            Jellyfish spew their sperm and eggs into the water around them, hope for it to meet up and make an egg that hatches into a larva, which roots itself to the ocean floor and grows into a polyp where the adult jellyfish grow like a stack of plates and each one individually buds off.