• @iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2614 hours ago

    they were never meant to be together, they would confuse the hell out of each other. Imagine they have two kids and she says pick kid[1] from the school, then what?

  • And then he texts back ‘where are you?’ And then she texts back ‘the first table’ and he replies ‘umm I’m here too. But I don’t see you’ confused she asks him ’ table 0p?’ And then ‘01*?’ He says ‘no, 00.’ Releaved she says ‘lol I am at table 01’ he chuckles ‘I am at 00, I’ll go find you’

    Later they get married and have kids. But relationship collapses and it ruins both of them and they cannot find the heart to love anyone again. Their children grow up broken and struggle through life. Some get arrested end up in prison, all of them repeatedly fall into a series of toxic relationships for the rest of their lives.

    • @ulterno
      link
      English
      -15 hours ago

      Guy is wrong. Went to 0th table. She asked for 1st table.

      • @NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1324 hours ago

        Rulers measure cardinal quantities and not ordinal ones. There is no cardinal numbering scheme that starts at 1, all of them “start” at 0. For ordinal numbering schemes, the symbols are arbitrary anyway and you can start with whatever you want. It’s equally valid to start with 1, 0, -1, A, or “aardvark”. The only benefit to picking 1 as the start is to make it easier to count with your fingers while picking 0 lets you easily convert an ordinal quantity to a cardinal one.

      • @Godnroc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 day ago

        I’ve seen a lot of rulers that actually don’t have a mark at 0 and instead go right to the edge as 0. Typically they are worn down, being made of wood, so the accuracy of the first inch is dubious. To ensure the distance is correct, sliding the ruler down one unit is a good idea. So, my ruler starts at 0 but my measurements start at 1.

          • @xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            201 day ago

            It really depends on what you’re measuring. Good luck measuring the distance from a corner if you can’t get 0 to touch the end.

            Tape measures are almost always designed with this in mind, so you can hook the end over an edge, or butt it up against something and the measurement will be accurate both ways, since the metal end can slide in or out by just the right amount.

        • @absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          620 hours ago

          When playing games with the kids, we start at 0 being the position you are currently in, then count from there.

          e.g. in snakes and ladders, if you are on spot 30 and roll a 5, tap spot 30 and say “zero”, then spot 31 is “one” etc… till you are at spot 35 saying “five”.

          Teaches the kids about zero and avoids miss counts from the younger ones counting their current position as “one”

        • @spikespaz@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          723 hours ago

          There’s another way to think about it which I actually use. Look in the empty bin and say “zero”, then move an apple and say “one”.

      • @affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        131 day ago

        i wish the people making buildings around here knew that. some start at floor 3, others at 5. some start at 0. others at 2. every building has its own story. you need to understand the building before you can understand your position in it.

    • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      81 day ago

      Why? It seems exactly as valid to me, and more valid if you like positional numberings of your physical stuff.

      You just count the number of times you departed from an item in order, rather than the times you arrived.

  • @yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    301 day ago

    The real punch line is that in a cafe run by programmers, esoteric rules are in full force, but tables 0 and 1 are no where near each other.

  • Anna
    link
    fedilink
    26
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Hey, if she thinks 1 is 1st index then you dogged dodged a bullet and deserve better.

    Happy now all you English majors.

    • @OneCardboardBox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      821 hours ago

      A much better idea than when I tried to organize my restaurant with hashtables.

      It was too much for the waitstaff, who had to reindex the floor plan every time they added or removed a plate.

      On the plus side, delivering the right food was always O(1).

  • @netvor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    521 day ago

    Don’t wanna state the obvious, but it looks like they still ended up staring at each other for the rest of the evening.

    They have shown that they still love each other, so hope they can work with their one irreconcilable difference.