• bobburger
    link
    fedilink
    -95 hours ago

    This is absolutely correct. I’m sure the 40% of voters who want to keep sending weapons to Israel aren’t even Harris voters. So clearly the Democratic party is only doing it for the love of genocide and it seems obvious that after they finish the genocide in Gaza and Lebanon they’ll shift their focus to genocide of Palestinians and other arabs living in America. This is completely unacceptable to me which is why I voted for Trump.

    I thought about voting for a third party but I live in a swing state and want to minimize the chances of Koncentration Kamp Kamala from getting elected so I directly supported Trump rather than indirectly.

    • ArxCyberwolf
      link
      fedilink
      52 hours ago

      “Koncentration Kamp Kamala”

      Listen to yourself. You’re beyond delusional. Seek help.

    • @Soup@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Sooooo… because you can’t be bothered to understand how things work. You voted for someone that suggests that Israel “finish the job.”

      That sure showed those pesky libs!

      You’re about as bad-faith as it gets. You’re MAGA, through and through. Drop the act that it has anything to do with genocide.

    • @Ephoron
      link
      -24 hours ago

      I live in a swing state and want to minimize the chances of Koncentration Kamp Kamala from getting elected so I directly supported Trump rather than indirectly.

      I could no more vote Trump ‘tactically’ than I could Harris. I think one ought vote according to one’s concience. The whole notion of tactical voting makes a mockery of democracy, if no one could be persuaded to vote tactically there’d be significantly less ‘electioneering’. More like the Nordic model, with way more parties catering to a broader range of political views.

      You only have to look at the current Democrat campaign, they barely need a policy at all, they’re running almost entirely on being not-Trump.