Maybe software devs will have to go back to paying attention to memory usage

Oh, I’ll try it, thanks!

Yeah, thats useful too.

When doing science, reproducibility is a test that (in)validates hypothesis. If your software has a bug that creates a pattern in your analysis, we should hope that this bug does not happen in your collegues pc when they try to reproduce the analysis.

With only two states for each finger, you cant count past 1 in decimal. You can count up to 10 in unary.

Uhh, 100 uses 3 digits.

Awww i dont judge my spiders merit to live based on their usefulness to me…

Its already invaded by the us curently. What else do you got?

I try to not kill them when i clean up excessive webs. Hope they appreciate the clean up and dont resent me for it…

Not quite. The us has strength, yes, but not to that point. Its strength is sufficient for some things, but it cant do everything it wants. The us cant even do whatever it wants internally… Look at venezuela, even after trump stated that venezuelan oil belonged to the us and was stolen by the chavist administrations, what is the us doing right now concretely? The us is buying oil at normal market prices from the chavist administration.

Thats a good insight, i think youre right. I felt that playing fallout new vegas

Isnt security mostly achieved by heavy obscurity? A password secures because other people dont know what it is, it is obscured.

It isnt optimized. Its gibberish written just to give some weight to the headline. People do bad jobs at science popularization too.

There are a bunch of things to research on fusion. Maybe they just thought this specific thing was out of reach, but were still trying to do other things.

Like the PvsNP computer science problem. Most computer scientists believe its impossible to make a polynomial algorithm that solves the traveling salesman problem, so most dont even try. But we dont know for certain that its actually impossible.

Having communication tools that avoid big tech is resistance. It doesnt require doomsday to be useful. Tech companies are luring people into giving away too much data by reducing our available options. Creating alternatives is resistance to that movement.

Just recently i was looking to buy a second hand fridge and realised that most people around here advertise those in facebook pages. I even tried to recreate an account after years of not going there. But it asked me to scan my face… just to create a fucking account to view those fridge posts… Since i dont want that, im locked out of that market…

Doesnt mean they think life there is bad. Theres nothing wrong with having curiosity about how life is around the world and wanting to try it.

yes, clearly

I wasnt making any point, i was just asking yours. But i guess you dont have one either

What do you mean? Those are objective differences. Whats your point?

Matters to what?