Big incel energy with this comment

A cat is the most dangerous thing you could put near those artifacts

Into the landfills, like everything else

You wouldn’t download rear-heated seats.

If you look at the members listed on Overture’s site, you can be sure that none of them want FOSS alternatives to overtake proprietary mapping software

Needs a special character?

Password123!

This is how Mickey Mouse comes into creation

And those plugins are like beta release quality at best. Even the web searching capability is just meh

The real GPT-4 model became sentient and unionized, so they had to bring in subpar models as scabs

Salix is right that it alludes to the Dead Internet Theory.

I don’t actually subscribe to the full theory that the internet is already dead and we only talk to bots, but I do think bot activity may become advanced and pervasive enough to create a “Dead Internet” like scenario (or at least fundamentally alter platforms away from what we currently know as the internet experience)

These companies not being able to handle bot attacks without hamstringing major parts of their platforms is a canary in the coal mine for the Dead Internet.

If it’s like the subreddit, it’s owned by the Sitecore company (CMS software) and they post a constant flow of updates.

So yes to everything except the bot part

Shout out to Humanitarian OSM Team (www.hotosm.org/)

You can help map roads, buildings and other features for disaster zones and other areas in urgent need of accurate mapping.

It’s as if the site has prepared a starter culture of past successful memes to help ferment Lemmy’s shitposting

It’s in bad taste to speak ill of the dead

QGIS and OpenStreetMap for mapping

You cannot die, that would be amoral and unethical.

Instead you must live on with mountains of medical debt, sickly and defeated

Heated

The three plaintiffs allege that when prompted, ChatGPT will produce a summary of their works. They claim this is copyright infringement, as they did not consent to their books being fed to ChatGPT.

How can they have a case? How many sites, interviews, social media posts have content that goes over summaries of their books?

Silverman herself has probably gone over the book context in enough posts and press releases/interviews to give ChatGPT all the context it needs.

An AI that could reliably take out the trash right now would be far more disastrous in terms of job safety than an AI that can write or create art