Das und die drei Pflanzen im Topf.
Das und die drei Pflanzen im Topf.
Well people with connections to the goverment need a way to launder money.
You cannot compare religion and science. They are fundamentally different philosophies. Hence if someone tries to force one into the other they get garbeld garbage.
Ja, dann ist der Durschnitt rechtsextrem. So funktioniert Demokratie.
Deswegen lässt eine Wehrhafte Demokratie nicht zu das 70% Faschos werden.
Which rules?
Additionaly u are giving them more visibility, as uncommented statements are creticless, people rather read those.
Das ist auch die selbe Person die, eine Bibliothek pflegt, die unseren gesamten Softwarestack begründet.
Well dont stop, continue. Only in dialogue can we defeat our differences.
Otherwise you seperate and isolate people, and strengthen they’re belives.
There are people that you can show all the facts and logic and proof and they are not going to believe. Those people I refer to as stupid. ( I dont call em that. No need to be rude). Dont be such a person yourself.
Hence, always try to engage in dialogue and be flexible enough in your worldviews. But also know some people are not and there is nothing you can do.
But other people reading this will see you be right.
Nazbol? What does this dead movement have to do with anything?
Aber dann bekommen die mein Geld :/
Falschinformationen, Nudeln hat keine ApfelUhr.
Er antwortete aber und sprach zu ihnen: Wer einen Bubatz hat, der gebe dem, der keines hat; und wer Speise hat, tue ebenso.
Nur dafür will ich ein Feuerzeug mit CSU oder am besten Bild von Söder.
That is true we need to fix the problem. So in your analogy you would’ve stopped giving the person pain medication?
And how is the person crippled by pain supposed to stand, walk or excercise without pain medication?
I get it addition to pain medication is bad. I would assume most people know that, even those addicted. But the alternative is those people succumbing to pain, which would prevent any improvments.
Hence, yes I agree. Just throwing around money is not going to be the solution, but so is also not giving any.
Zuber eats argument can be criticized without using Ad Hominems.
Nice that the SBU chief told in an interview on the 27th how the planning and execution of those murders was done. So there is your link.
Tho I do not share the views of the blogger. Innocent people that where not involved in any hostilities did get harmed.
Additionaly deliberate killing of noncombatants based on they’re race, views or political motivations, etc. using military funds is a warcrime.
Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.
Please go inform yourself before participating in any discussion.
I agree that incorrect administration of welfare can lead to that. But thats also the politicians job to manage.
Thats also comparable to saying I don’t visit doctors I fear a mistreatment.
Nice ad hominem.
Please read the scentence again. There is a “EVEN IF” and not a “THAT”.
Killing civilians by planting bombs in statues is not asymetric warfare.
No, but you can clearly see the facial structure, clothing, shoes and other factors that any agency would use for.identification.
Wärend, der Rest der ehemaligen BRD nur graues namenloses Ödland ist. Steht eine stolz und ungebrochen. Die CSU geführe “Bodensee” Nation.