

Just need to get AI on that.
Just need to get AI on that.
deleted by creator
damn
Among other issues that’s going to make it harder for them to do other stuff.
It has been a pretty short trip from “Don’t be evil” to “The cutting edge of late stage capitalism”
git branch testing.stephanie.slept.with.my.friend.brad
Then delete and start over, or don’t use data you don’t have explicit permission to use. in the first place.
It’s like a thief saying “well, I already fenced most of the stuff so it’s too hard to give any of it back. So let’s just call it quits, eh?”
or bloody universal healthcare
I guess it depends on where you live. It’s not true of the whole world.
Waiting for 100% oral exams to make a comeback.
heh, all of them (plus several others) were on my list of “never buy from them” list a decade ago. Never had any reason to reconsider
I’ve been saying for about 15 years now – you’d have to be a masochist to buy HP printers. Why do people keep enabling these shits? You just encourage them to be even worse. Don’t stand for even a little of their bullshit and they will change or die. You make a noose for your own neck.
Neither, though I do watch a bit of Matt Parker on youtube, so it’s a decent guess.
I expect a lot more authors will go this (crowdfunding) route; if Kelsey Dionne can get over $1.3 million for a fairly niche TTRPG product (albeit that it was a very well done example of its particular niche), publishing straight up fiction books via crowdfunding has to look pretty damn attractive.
(edit: added a missing word)
And if it’s the first time you’ve seen that xkcd link, congratulations, you are one of today’s meta-10000
What, too soon?
heard that one earlier today …
I’m not completely off reddit yet (reduced interaction but still disentangling from it, it’ll probably take a little while yet to be completely gone), but I made the account I have there now in August 2008, just shy of 15 years ago. I lurked for a good while before making that account though. (edit: > 150K comment karma, most participation on low volume subs)
Even a little button wear would be enough to pick between those three, so in a lot of cases you’d just need to try one of them.
I’m fine with this. “We can’t succeed without breaking the law” isn’t much of an argument.
Do I think the current copyright laws around the world are fine? No, far from it.
But why do they merit an exception to the rules that will make them billions, but the rest of us can be prosecuted in severe and dramatic fashion for much less. Try letting the RIAA know you have a song you’ve downloaded on your PC that you didn’t pay for - tell them it’s for “research and training purposes”, just like AI uses stuff it didn’t pay for - and see what I mean by severe and dramatic.
It should not be one rule for the rich guys to get even richer and the rest of us can eat dirt.
Figure out how to fix the laws in a way that they’re fair for everyone, including figuring out a way to compensate the people whose IP you’ve been stealing.
Until then, deal with the same legal landscape as everyone else. Boo hoo