

Join me on BlueSky. It’s reached critical mass. It’s great.
Join me on BlueSky. It’s reached critical mass. It’s great.
According to legend, French soldier Nicolas Chauvin was badly wounded in the Napoleonic Wars and received a meager pension for his injuries. After Napoleon abdicated, Chauvin maintained his fanatical Bonapartist belief in the messianic mission of Imperial France, despite the unpopularity of this view under the Bourbon Restoration. His single-minded devotion to his cause, despite neglect by his faction and harassment by its enemies, started the use of the term.[2]
She already lost. Your liberal tears won’t fix anything.
My only regret is that I have but one vote to give Jill Stein
Nothing says chauvinism like saying, “meh, what’s a few hundred thousand lives of brown people on the other side of the world to me.”
I doubt anyone could make heads or tales of that diagram
It literally can’t get worse. Have you watched the news lately? The good news is the second in command of the world’s most ravenous, vicious, blood thirsty empire will soon be an unqualified blowhard–and the first in command will be similarly (un)qualified. Death to America.
Imagine being so thirsty for Palestinian blood that you gave the government to this guy
Hey buddy, um, your, uh, your chauvinism is hanging out.
It’s just a wiiitle genocide!!!
Libs couldn’t bother to stop a genocide to stop a fascist
Shortly after they were attacked by 10,000 French troops on skates?! How is this not a Broadway musical?
ACAB
Our fascist is better than their fascist!
This is just misinformation. The president has the ability and arguably the obligation to halt arms transfers to Israel.
FADEL: Now, you’ve written that a case could be made that Biden is legally required to stop funding Israel’s war. How?
BLANK: Well, there are at least three different laws that come into play here. One is the Humanitarian Aid Corridor Act. One is the Leahy Amendment on Foreign Assistance Act. And one is the conventional arms transfer policy, which is a different type of legislation. The clear text of all three of these pieces of legislation really would seem to prohibit or restrict the ability of the U.S. government to transfer aid. This, I should emphasize, is under existing U.S. law.
top: Have rigs
bottom left: opinionated tastes
bottom right: barrels