Are there any physical obstructions between the controller and the antenna? That’d reduce the effective range.

I love these memes that turn into threads full of vim tips. You really can do anything within vim. You can even exit vim!: !killall vim

Huh, I’m going to have to try that at some point. It’s even got nim support.

Link for the lazy

Interesting. I was thinking more of gray area stuff than outright lying, like playing up the importance of facts that support one’s position and downplaying those that don’t.

I read somewhere a while back that it’s supposedly an evolutionary thing. In a social competition for resource allocation, confidently arguing your position regardless of its correctness is more beneficial than admitting you may be wrong.

It’s probably exacerbated by the internet, where the relative anonymity and psychological disconnection further reduces any benefits to admitting to an error.

Did you ever get this working? I set up 23.05 recently on one of my machines, and my Dualsense controllers worked fine though the KDE bluetooth app once I enabled bluetooth in configuration.nix.

Fair enough. Thank you for the transparency and for resolving it quickly.

Yeah, probably. Aside from the fact that Dessalines and Nutomic aren’t actually trustworthy, it’s still a bad idea to blindly follow these kinds of decisions. I’m all for instances curating how they want to, but that requires them to deliberately decide for themselves, not just delegate to an outsider with an entirely different editorial policy.

I think especially Lemmy.ml should rather focus more on cleaning up their Tankie & moderator issues

As much as I would love to see it, I don’t think the lead devs of lemmy, who own both lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml, are going to ban themselves.

Ah yes, English, the Lingua Franca.

You’re posting to /c/foss, not /c/freeofchargeandthecodeisavailableforinspection.

You’re mixing up cranks and bigots. Bigots tend to get banned because they’re harmful. Cranks tend to exclude themselves on principle.

The term “crank” is usually used as a pejorative, but cranks can sometimes be beneficial. Richard Stallman is the prototypical example of a Free Software crank. Definitely annoying, but also definitely a net benefit to all of us.

That’d be covered by #4:

The license may require derived works to carry a different name or version number from the original software.

There is a clause about redistribution (1), and it expressly specifies that it applies to “aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources”, not single, standalone works.

That is a weird way of wording it. In practice I doubt there are any OSI-approved licenses that prohibit standalone commercial distribution. If there were, you could trivially comply by just including a “hello world” program to make it an aggregate distribution.

The government doesn’t want you to know this, but identities are free. You can just take them. I have 458 identities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire

Something something penetrator tip

Dr. Evil moment

Anti-white

Anti-cis

Oh no! Anyway…

I mean, them dropping a chunk of money for “political” stuff over software development is kind of curious, though maybe there is a good reason for it. In any case, this meme is sus as hell, and posted from a throwaway account. What are you up to, OP?

In addition to this community, you may want to check out linux4noobs as a place to post general usage questions.