Blake (he/him)

Assuming they’re not qualified is a form of implicit racial bias

I don’t think this includes the engine

That’s what most people said about Trump in 2016.

How is it an alternative?

More information just came out that forced his hand

Seems AI generated and very basic. Barely a game

Generalizations aren’t productive

Only if it increased by a very large margin like a DDoS attack

For a good laugh and/or headache check out Google’s history of “wallet” offerings listed on Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Wallet#History

This is the same guy who started a remote company then tried to pull a “return to office” move on his employees without much notice. I highly doubt they could build their own OS given their poor management record

That’s exactly right. Even if we made an AI that could give us the perfect solution and had accurate projections to back up its assertions, inevitably we’d reject it because we wouldn’t trust it fully. It cannot fix the often selfish nature of humans

Many Catholic priests are gay, and it’s sort of incentivized. Their view is that being gay doesn’t inherently mean you’re a bad person or going to hell. However, acting on gay sexual urges is a sin. So becoming a priest and being celibate is a convenient out. Also there’s a priest shortage, so turning a blind eye is likely common

JerryRigEverything said is his recent teardown review that Pixel repairability has gotten particularly worse on the 9. Sounded like the battery was very difficult to remove

^~ bat signal for Lina Khan ~^

Honestly can’t believe Google was so explicit in calling RCS an “open standard” and then turning around and doing this

Well, sure, but I’m sure most coal miners don’t feel super great about their specific job and profession generally. It’s a waste of resources and capital generally, not at a zoomed in level

Intentions aside, it’s just some independent research that anyone can review and critique. If the research is bad then it should be pointed out and won’t be taken seriously, undermining any influence from Goldman Sachs now and in the future

Oh, sure, I didn’t mean to compare the two really. Just pointing out that although Twitter is simple and easy to replicate in concept, trying to scale to support all humans as users (theoretically) is difficult

To be fair, Twitter needs very good infrastructure to be usable (e.g. caching) and obviously content moderation is as robust as their investment in it (those could be contract workers though)

If Goldman Sachs said that, than most likely the opposite is true.

What makes you say that?