• 3 Posts
  • 200 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 17th, 2025

help-circle







  • the cope is unreal.

    nuclear is the cleanest and most sure energy method of production proportionaly to the enrgy produce by it and by a long mile. You were convinced by stupid ecology ideals ( russian propaganda) to not invest in anything except for unreliable and intermitent energy production cause you could always burn russian gaz. if it wasnt the case nord stream 1 and 2 wouldnt exist. You still produce and pollute a lot with coal, France it s litteraly 100x less coal.

    1 you give no reason why nuclear bad

    2 no vision of the future

    3 no vision of the future + no money

    4 yeah how independance from russia is going ? https://archive.is/p9noZ

    5 no vision of future + no money

    6 no vision of future

    7 yeah talk me about all the uranium mine in france

    8 yeah cause uranium isnt well known to have an ultra high energy dencity and you can’t procure it

    9 yeah and it s dumb and it cost highly for lmittle to no benefice

    wp germany







  • No, it’s not that. You’re definitely wrong. Slaves being bought, sold and abused were complying with the law, and that did not work out for them. People of Japanese ancestry were complying with the law when they were moved into concentration camps during WWII, and that was not okay

    Can u have an exemple that happened when you were born ?

    Just complying with the law is not going to protect you from harm.

    Agree in theory butt you push the argument to an extreme that make no sens.

    To add to this, black people had to fight against the law for almost a century in order to get recognized as equal to white people. Women had to protest and non-comply with the law in order to get recognized as equal to men.

    Again can u take an exemple that happened from where your were born ?

    So active non-compliance is practically a requirement for things to change for legally marginalized people.

    Can u describe who is the marginalized ppl in that case ?

    I don’t think you could be convinced that you are wrong, despite the preponderance of evidence that you couldn’t be further from the truth.

    yeah cause it s well known that your chance to be a victim of police violence dont dramaticaly increase when you refuse to complie. The real problem with explaining it all is that every time I see someone going hard to defend the absolute dumbest, room-temp IQ, stance on a situation.