Lol, no. We’ll all just suffer quietly thanks.

Don’t try to normalize this abomination. The preparation is as bad as the ingredients.

I have never had an HP devices with a screen where the screen did not die.

passive swarm shooter

Go full weird with it and only use tis instead of it’s. No confusion that way.

Beans hat? Jeans shat.

I think you’re reading too much into intent here. The only reasoning that goes into these decisions is target audience. Who will buy what you are producing? When most of the comics that you mentioned were written, the perception was very much that their readers would be boys.

If there’s anything to be mad about, it’s that focus testing and demographic targeting makes for shit entertainment. It means companies are trying to make something that sells instead of trying to tell a story.

I’ve long since blocked HexBear , but will occasionally click the “show me anyway” button just to validate that decision. I’m somehow still surprised by the advanced stage brainrot every time.

a= “birds are dinos”

b= “dinos are reptiles”

c= “birds are reptiles”

Structure: If a then b, therefore c

a does not imply b without an additional statement (which we can assume from the rest would be “because birds are reptiles”)

You’ve basically just said birds are reptiles because birds are reptiles

I think they were pointing out the structural issue with your statement. They info you are attempting to convey is correct. Your ability to do so is questionable.

A wealthy man from Soth Africa has weird views on eugenics? I’m shocked!

So I took a browse through your comment history out of idle curiosity. You’re an “um actually” concern troll that just looks for things to argue about. It’s pretty obvious you don’t actually care. Maybe you shouldn’t feel satisfaction with being a contrarian assbag for entertainment.

Are you sure that wasn’t just an attempted joke about the phrase asexual reproduction?

Now it’s a Z:\bra

I’m pretty sure cow is the species common name and bull/heffer are the sex variant terms.

You know, like how a rooster and a hen are both still chickens?

They’ve left out pears, and I’ve chosen to take that as a personal insult.

Is a Romano as unpleasant as it looks? I’m having a hard time understanding the appeal.

Do the French dislike honey?

None of this has a point. We’re talking over a shitpost rant about common use of math symbols. Even the conclusion boils down to it being a context dependent matter of preference. I’m just disagreeing that the original question as posed should be interpreted with weak juxtaposition.

My argument is specifically that using no separation shows intent for which way to interpret and should not default to weak juxtaposition.

Choosing not to use (6/2)(1+2) implies to me to use the only other interpretation.

There’s also the difference between 6/2(1+2) and 6/2*(1+2). I think the post has a point for the latter, but not the former.