Clean!

Looks like a ball sack ^^

Yeah :)

Hérisson kinda sounds like oursin, I wonder if it evolved from it. (The word not the animal)

In French we call them virgin CDs ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Nice! Sounds very handy, I actually didn’t know this type of extractor existed.

Oh Nice thats not bad at all

I didn’t know about Farmell, thank you for the link!

That’s where my biggest hesitation lies: old style or cartridge. I hear that they’re better but I’m concerned about life-expectancy. Do you know how well those all-in-one tips age?

Hmmmm I wasn’t thinking of getting hot air which I’ve never used, but could be worth getting for the future.

Can you completely remove the suction bit and cable?

Thanks for your input!

Pitted tips 🥲 I know your pain. I ended up taking it off but I was going to write I’d like to not go over 150€, so this is perfect. Thanks for your input!

Wtf indeed

Look it’s my opinion from personal experience, just disregard it if it bothers you.

I read the whole series of posts but didn’t see them, I guess I needed to search some more - my bad.

I’m not saying social media doesn’t let you do all those things, I’m saying you don’t need it to do them.

I don’t have kids and never used Snapchat, but what does Snapchat provide that helps them communicate better than let’s say WhatsApp?

Edit: I went to dig on Burnett’s page for the links you tell me about. All I found was a radio interview of a doctor on radio Boston, an article from the Sunday times about Burnett’s book and an article on Wales online, also about the book.

Could you link me to the relevant articles I must have missed?

Edit 2: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7364393/ Found this article that combines different studies made on the subject. Around halfway through the page you will find the results of some of these studies and you will see the answer isn’t clear.

Let’s remember the ban in Australia concerns platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Reddit and X. Exemptions will apply to services such as YouTube, messenger kids, whatsapp, kids helpline and google classroom.

The account you provided starts by stating that “the most rigorous analysis” found little/no significant evidence , but fails to link to them. He immediately lumps together smartphone and social media, then goes on justifying the importance of both with arguments that clearly concern almost exclusively smartphones.

This ban is about social media, not smartphones altogether.

Garwboy’s arguments:

• they let kids stay connected with friends, foster a community, allow coordination of activities: he’s talking about smartphones.

• they allow access to school work, references, important resources: again, smartphones/the internet

• they allow access to support, help and guidance from experienced and informed individuals and groups: this point I’ll give to him; as for years, Reddit has served that very purpose for me. Who knows what that site has become though.

• he compares them to roads (roads kill children every year, but they save many lives, make the world go round,…): again this whole comparison is only valid for smartphones.

• they are a refuge for children who experience abuse at home: this is probably true, but it is not an argument about how social media helps in these situations. I could say the same about drugs .

Which brings us to my point of view: social media are, for many, a drug. A bit of it can be good, fun and even sometimes make your like better, but we have to acknowledge the negative side, which in my opinion can have devastating effects in a person’s mental, especially when the mental is still in its forming stage.

I’m sorry lots of people on here apparently need to be dicks about pretty much anything they’re trying to say… I don’t disagree with them but there must be a less toxic way to say it. Thank you for making new content, Lemmy needs it!

Seems like you might also enjoy Cody’s lab and This old Tony

Can’t talk for the two others but Slay the spire will kill you allot of time!

I’m atheist and I agree with you.

I think neither the inspirational post nor the answer were too smart. God and oxygen may be as invisible as each other most of the time but I think most people can survive 20 minutes without god.

Then again I don’t know what god does in the different religions that is so important to life… If he’s important for the creation of life then I guess it makes sense even though he just had to be there 2000 years ago for his week of creation, we don’t need him now to keep living. But maybe he is out of time and either always exists, or never does. In that case I guess he would need to exist to be able to have done what he allegedly did back then to give us life.

I know I’m overthinking a quote that’s just supposed to … Well I’m actually not sure what it’s supposed to do except convert people to believe in god now that I think about it. But then again I’m high

Oh sorry I didn’t realize it was personal. Don’t mind me then

I think you missed this part: “Imagine if each country spent their military $$ on water, food, housing, and free medical care for their citizens.” I know it unfortunately isn’t even remotely realistic but that’s the comment you answered to :)