In the end, the KIA car company made its cars into subscription models, I really hate this because in the end the car we buy with our own money doesn’t feel like it belongs to us. Should we finally buy an old school car ? so as not to be affected by this subscription models or is there a way to crack the software installed in it ?

  • Transporter Room 3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22111 months ago

    I love all the comments saying “yeah well that stuff isn’t free someone has to maintain it”

    YOU’RE PAYING 100K FOR A FUCKING CAR

    That’s the payment. That’s what they get their money from.

    Wanting more in perpetuity is fucking stupid no matter what the excuse is.

    • @june@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5711 months ago

      There’s also the fact that remote start, while shorter range, has existed on key fobs for like 20 years. My ex wife’s 2022 Hyundai has remote start, but only through the app, while my 2013 Focus has it on the key fob.

      That’s honestly the only feature that’s bundled in those subscriptions that I really want, though the alarm notification is a nice to have.

    • @IronicDeadPan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2311 months ago

      A 2024 Kia Telluride is right around $50,000 USD (fully loaded specs), but I get what you’re saying with regards to vehicles in general.

      Like BMW and Tesla having “creature comforts” behind subscriptions.

    • @vamputer@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2011 months ago

      Not only that, but if you have no choice but to buy a car with internet connectivity, these are supposed to be the kind of bells and whistles they give to at least make it SEEM like you’re not being completely taken advantage of. It’s like a double-dip. “We’re giving your car connectivity so we can sell your telemetry, AND we get to charge you for all the useful features, too!”

      If it costs SO much to maintain these services, cool. I’d be happy to save the poor little car manufacturers money by buying a model that uses no connectivity whatsoever. But, for some reason, they don’t seem to want to offer that. Gee, I wonder why.

      Demand more out of them, because they’ll always be looking to get more out of you.

    • yeehaw
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1211 months ago

      This reminds me of the video game industry. Make a complete game, then choose to remove pieces to sell later as add-on content. Lol. The only thing I see costing them money is if they have to pay for an LTE subscription to maintain that internet connectivity so you can start your car from an app.

    • farquadsquads
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1111 months ago

      They have considered how much the gains from being evil assholes offset the cost of alienating some people, and found that they make more by being evil, it’s not stupid.

      • youmaynotknow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 months ago

        You keep mentioning “official video by (insert manufacturer name here)”. Are you even thinking when you say that? It’s the manufacturer, what the hell were you expecting them to promote? “were fucking you over, so here’s why you have to give us more money for a car that you think is yours but actually will never be”?

        • @locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The video shows the fob starting the car. It also states that you can pay for the app to be able to do it anywhere.

          It’s not a promo video, it’s a “how to” for car owners.

          Are we not to believe that it really does that?

          What is this internet thing for if I can’t find information? Do I have to drive to a car dealership and ask to find out if this is true? Do I need to see it in action? When I do, can you even trust my answer?

          • youmaynotknow
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            Not 1 person here has mentioned that it doesn’t work. Not 1 person here has said that the “feature” is useless or anything remotely similar.

            What is in question here is the fucking pushing of companies to tie as many idiots as humanly possible to their subscriptions to keep on draining funds from them.

            Give me the car for free, and maybe I’ll subscribe. Otherwise, I buy stuff with ALL it’s capabilities enabled or not at all.

            My car is worth US$85,000 in my country. Everything works, app and all, and I don’t have to pay anything other than my loan, insurance, maintenance and charge (yes, it’s an electric vehicle).

            I own a 2023 BYD Han, I have an account for the app, and I can do whatever it’s able to do from it without ever having to open my wallet again.

            If and when they decide to make this a paid subscription, then I’ll sell that one, and move on.

            So, yeah, follow a bullshit advertisement that you call a “tutorial” and believe what you want. They are just like drug pushers, only for tech.

            Now who is the one making fucking noise without looking a things from a common sense perspective?

            • @locuester@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              111 months ago

              Now who is the one making fucking noise without looking a things from a common sense perspective?

              IMO, you. Again, the video isn’t marketing. The car auto-starts just fine without paying anyone a penny extra.

              The manufacturer offers overpriced warranties and app features. Totally optional. You don’t have to buy it.

              The dealership offers overpriced vehicle service also. It’s optional. You don’t have to buy it.

              Some people want that stuff. I don’t. You don’t. 🤝

    • Goku
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 months ago

      Not to mention the data they mine from you with their “app” that they can sell to advertisers.

    • @MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 months ago

      The issue is that with ongoing service across time, the longer the service is being used the more it costs Kia. The larger the time boxes Kia uses the bigger the number is and the more you’re going to scare off customers.

      Using Kias online build and price, looks like the most expensive Telluride you can get right now is $60k MSRP, cheapest at 30k

      Let’s assume Kia estimates average lifetime of a Telluride to be 20 years so they create an option to purchase this service one time for the “lifetime” of the vehicle. Taking in good faith the pricing Kia has listed, using that $150 annual package, and assuming that price goes up every year at a rate of 10% (what Netflix, YouTube, etc have been doing) across those twenty years you’re looking at around $8.5k option. At the top trim thats still 14% extra that is going to make some buyers hesitant, at the base model that’s 28% more expensive.

      Enough buyers will scoff at that so Kia can either ditch the idea entirely as they’ll lose money on having to pay for the initial development and never make their money back, or they find some way to repackage that cost and make it look like something that buyers are willing to deal with.

      To me the bigger issue is the cost of the service vs what you’re getting. Server time + dev team + mobile data link cannot be costing Kia more than a few million annually, mid to upper hundred K is more likely so they must not be expecting that many people to actually be paying for any of this

    • @devilish666@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 months ago

      Finally someone who gets it
      Glad to see you here my fellow comrades
      Honestly the people who defended subscription models for something that you already paid & own are dumb (or maybe just trolling around) like people who defend adobe for subscription models

      • Saik0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -111 months ago

        Honestly the people who defended subscription models for something that you already paid & own are dumb

        You don’t own the cellular towers your car needs to connect to in order to work with the app.

        • youmaynotknow
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 months ago

          But you do pay to use the network. So, you’re still paying for it.

          • Saik0
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            That’s the point. It IS a subscription. The person I’m responding to believes that it shouldn’t be and that they’ve paid for it already.

          • Saik0
            link
            fedilink
            English
            311 months ago

            It doesn’t. The car works just fine. The features that require a cell phone are specific to operating your car while not present at your car.

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    17711 months ago

    you should absolutely choose a vehicle without subscriptions, and make a point of stating it at time of purchase

    this is your one moment to make a difference

  • @criticon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14311 months ago

    And then you can’t use it when the temp is 0F because they decide to do some maintenance

    • Voytrekk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1911 months ago

      I do find that the days I need it the most it’s slower than molasses.

    • @devilish666@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 months ago

      Imagine your car need an updates or you don’t paying subscription fee or but the server are offline & you’re in emergency situation, and the worst of it your car won’t start without it OMG… that’s scarred me the hell out of it

      • Thorned_Rose
        link
        fedilink
        511 months ago

        My spouse was just telling me about someone who got stuck waiting for an hour because their car decided to unexpectedly do an update

  • @Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8511 months ago

    The only problem with services as a subscription is THE FUCKING IDIOTS THAT PAY FOR THEM

    If nobody fell for shit like that, manufacturers would drop it like boiling diarrhea

  • @danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6911 months ago

    Worth noting that these features appear to require your car to be connected to a cellular network. This isn’t the same as BMW charging a fee for heated seats.

    They could have just put a SIM card in your car and required you to pay your cell phone provider for a connection.

  • @Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6811 months ago

    The crazy thing is that at the price you are paying for a friggin telluride they could easily raise the price by a few hundred (ie several years worth of subscription) and it would be unlikely to shift sales by much at all but would not piss off the buyers like this. You can’t put this crap on your car loan either. I really get the sense there is a conspiracy level concerted effort to try to indoctrinate generation Z into allowing every corporation they deal with to stick an IV into their bank accounts.

    • @CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5111 months ago

      They intentionally didn’t roll the subscription into the sale price. That’s the goal. They want that sweet, predictable, monthly income that they sell their investors on.

      They also figured that if you’ve found your car, you’re less likely to walk away for what is essentially a fraction of the car’s price.

      I honestly hope the next car I buy has shit like this. Because boy am I going to make it my mission to jailbreak it and release my code open source.

      • @Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 months ago

        If you are clever, confident, and savvy about it I think you could get your next car for free. If there was a kickstarter type project where I could pledge an amount in support of a jailbreak for a car I owned or was thinking of getting, I’d pledge a decent amount, I think a lot of people would.

        • @CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1611 months ago

          That’s the irony of all of this. I too would donate to a project that was actively trying to do this, even donate to their legal fund. I’d probably pay more than the subscription!

          These asshole companies just don’t realize that a determined developer and engineer will move heaven and earth to make sure that their freedoms (as in speech) aren’t restricted.

          I don’t care if it’s illegal. It’s my fucking car. Once you sell it to me, it ceases to be your property. You leave $100 bill in the glove compartment before you sell it to me? Well it’s mine now.

          You leave software on my car’s computer? Welp, it’s mine now.

      • youmaynotknow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        Keep us posted on make and model. I sure as hell will try to get one myself and help you test the shit out of that jailbreak.

    • Footnote2669
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      10 years of this subscription is $1500. Would anyone blink if they were buying a new car for 1500 more? lol

      • Saik0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        I would… I don’t want the feature. So why should I pay for it?

  • @corship@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4611 months ago

    This type of subscription is actually kiiiiinda understandable because the company has to maintain servers, staff and keep the software secure because they’re handling sensitive data such as location etc.

    I also remember that BMW I think? Had a heated seat subscription and that’s really not justifiable imo

  • @z00s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4011 months ago

    Simple. Buy an older car and spend the extra money maintaining it. Reducing demand is the only language consumers have that businesses understand.

    It doesn’t have to be ancient; even 5-10 year old cars don’t have this bullshit.

  • 𝓢𝓮𝓮𝓙𝓪𝔂𝓔𝓶𝓶
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3711 months ago

    I own a Kia. I don’t enjoy the subscription anymore than the next guy but I’m calling bullshit.

    The only features behind a pay wall are the ones the app provides. The ones that require an always on internet connection and server infrastructure to maintain.

    None of the in-car features are limited. The remote start on my key fob, seat heaters, onboard nav, all work fine without a subscription.

    This isn’t like the crap bmw was pulling with the seat heaters.

  • @aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3611 months ago

    “You wouldn’t download a car.”

    I would absolutely hack the heated seats to work without my credit card.

  • adONis
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3411 months ago

    or… we just need more FOSS alternatives to the car manufacturers proprietary OS.

    I already see GH issues like: “breaks stop working when going above 200mph.”

    • @hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 months ago

      There’s already an open source bike. Carrying several tons of metal everywhere you go is kind of a bad idea anyway.

        • @hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Don’t you think it’s interesting that even though the vast majority of car trips are a single person going less than a mile, every time someone brings up bikes the rebuttal is always “what if I need to move my family of 16 and their refrigerator 800 miles in freezing rain!?”

          The US was built on rail. The infrastructure could be fixed. It’s a choice not to fix it. It would be better to put in energy to fixing this than creating an open source way to access a proprietary transit system. Infrastructure is the problem, car vendors are just exploiting it.

          Edit: correction, 52% of trips in the US in 2021 were under 3 miles and 28% are under a mile according to US DoE (https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/articles/fotw-1230-march-21-2022-more-half-all-daily-trips-were-less-three-miles-2021). 2% we’re over 50 miles. Over 60% were under 5 miles, which is still pretty easy with an eBike given functional infrastructure.

          • @Trincapinones@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            311 months ago

            Yeah, but I’m not from the US, I’m from a small town in Europe, you can put “all that effort” in both places at the same time because they are 2 completelly different problems

            • @hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -111 months ago

              They aren’t two completely different problems, they’re in direct opposition. Making cars more tolerable increases demand for cars. Improving mass transit and bike infrastructure decreases demand. One is sustainable, the other is not.

    • @devilish666@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 months ago

      I think the term you mean is old car especially from before 2018
      in the end old cars basically open source you can modified it whatever you want as long as not breaking regulations

        • Thorned_Rose
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Nissan Leafs are plenty DIY repairable. It was part of our decision making process when considering buying an EV. There’s also electric conversions if that’s your jam.

      • @psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 months ago

        Some of us want all the internet connected options. And want to own their machine and have good security

        Open source car software and firmware would do that

  • @bartolomeo@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2411 months ago

    I might be the guy that shows up at the revolution for the most trivial reason but I hate that it says $59.00 per annually like companies think they’re so smart for having business school graduates on staff charging for things only business school graduates would think to charge for but they can’t even get basic grammar right.