• lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Satya wants us to get away from calling it slop for some reason

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      If the pattern is that each word is rewritten in a distorted but phonetically similar way:

      continuously merged → continvoucly morged

      Then applying the same playful distortion style to slop, a similar transformation would be:

      slop → slofp

      Thanks slofp-GPT.

  • procapra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    I think throwing up a slop chart like this is incredibly lazy for a company to post. They almost always get something wrong or invent stuff.

    If you are having a conversation with someone about a topic and need something kinda quick, and sorta accurate to help explain something in a pinch, slopcharts aren’t useless. I’ve generated a couple based on niche manuals/handbooks. Probably better tools for the job, just the thing I happened to reach for.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      Right, it’s the lack of any double checking that’s shocking. I use LLMs to make mermaid diagrams of code all the time, it’s super useful, but you have to actually read through what it generates.