• MoffKalast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    On the other hand, I see the exact opposite in my town. The municipality is making decent changes, replacing diesel busses with CNG and hydrogen, setting up alternative fuel and charging stations, closing up the city center for cars, planting an absurd number of trees around anything that is renovated. The district heating plant does burn methane which is not the best but still cleaner than other options.

    And then around those clean silent busses there is a sea of decade old 3 liter diesel cars that smell like a petroleum refinery, and every time it gets cold, everyone who doesn’t have that district heating smokes up the entire town in a layer of fucking smog from all the fuel oil heating.

    I think the average person could use a hard look at themselves too. Too many people are using just whatever is cheapest and dgaf as long as they get what they want in their life. The only time I’ve seen anyone consider anything else is when there are government subsidies or taxes that artificially make the sustainable option cheaper.

  • whelk@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’ve been playing 5ish minute songs whenever I shower recently so I don’t take too long and waste water just because I want to be personally more responsible but man, it’s really hard to feel it’s worth caring sometimes when there’s so much water being gleefully dumped into AI and various other large scale wasteful practices

  • freagle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is not an accurate understanding of the problem. The entirety of generation capacity for almost all of electrification (except for the last few years and for a very small number of power plants) has been built to handle peak load. Peak load only exists for something like 50 hours out of the entire year. The lights in Time Square represent base load, as they are always on. Turning off the lights in Time Square would do absolutely nothing to manage peak loads as compressors are far and away more energy intensive than lighting is.

    The evidence we should be looking for is whether they require turning off AC in commercial buildings during peak load. Instead what we find is that ConEd is literally paying commercial real estate operators to reduce energy consumption during peak while asking residents to do it voluntarily without offering them compensation.

    That’s how you know the game is rigged. Not through base load lighting, but by literally paying commercial land lords to do something that residents are asked to do for free.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      Compressor startup is more intensive than lighting. Once the compressor is running it’s a pretty steady power consumption.

      A window unit, for example, on startup (assuming it doesn’t have a smooth start) will pull a full 20A. However, during operation it ultimately will pull around 5A.

      That said, there’s not some sort of special electrical budget which makes the lights in NYT come from baseload generators vs peakers. If those lights turned off, the total grid load would go down by the amount of power those lights consume. And, as it turns out, those lights are consuming around 150MW. That’s ~4 steel mills worth of heat just being shoved into the atmosphere for advertisement. It’s at least 1 powerplant’s worth of power.

      Shutting those lights off would take the coordination of something like 10 businesses vs telling the millions of residence of NY to adjust their power consumption. They absolutely would make a difference. It’s not like there isn’t still a base load of power needed with those lights off.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The lights in Time Square represent base load, as they are always on.

      I don’t see how that means turning them off at peak load wouldn’t lower peak load. It would also send a message that society is taking the issue seriously.

      • freagle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If you look at the difference between base load and peak load, it would be obvious that the lights are inconsequential to peak load.

        • gressen@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Peak load consists of base load plus variable components. Turning off some of the base load reduces peak load.

          • cogman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 minutes ago

            It’s actually a bit silly to call lighting a “base load”. That’s not how the grid works. Base load is specifically talking about the grid itself and what the lowest load is on the grid. They don’t have an actuarial table where your refrigerator gets put into the base load bucket while your bathroom lights are put in the peak load bucket. It’s all one load.

            What power companies are looking at is the demand curve. The lowest level of the demand curve is the base load. That’s all it is.

            Things do get trickier with commercial power, especially when talking about machinery. But for something as simple as lighting it’s completely straight forward. Turning off 150MW of lights frees 150MW of peeker capacity which can be used for more useful things like boiling water in a data center to answer questions wrong (I kid).

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          6 hours ago

          So is my air conditioner. It’s not like me turning the dial up a few degrees is going to keep the world spinning properly. /s

          It’s not just Times Square just like it’s not just my AC. Times Square is a visual representation of how seriously the city and it’s residents take the issue. If those lights are blaring, then I assume a whole lot of other corporate power consumption is likewise excepted.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 hours ago

      For sure that’s a better analysis of the whole thing. Although, I do think it is worth noting how much energy is devoted to stuff like advertising, which is ultimately not productive use of energy. And if that wasn’t done in the first place, there would be more energy to go around avoiding the problem of not having enough of it at peak ours.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 hours ago

        how much energy is devoted to stuff like advertising

        And stores and businesses leaving the lights on inside, even at night when the place is closed and nobody is there. And lighting up their entire giant parking lot all night as well, all night every night, even though they’re only open during hours of darkness for a few hours each day.

        I know it’s not that much energy in the grand scheme of things, especially now that everything is LED. But still, their complete disregard for energy savings – such that they can’t be bothered to install a simple timer circuit – irritates me.

        (I suspect that they’re also leaving the HVAC running at full capacity overnight as well. That might be a more significant waste of energy.)

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Exactly, and that’s just one example of massive waste. Another one is the fact that around half the food produced is just thrown away because it’s just more ‘efficient’ to do that. Capitalism is an absolutely insane system.

        • freagle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 hours ago

          HVAC is not left on over the weekends in most office buildings in NYC. There are incentives and certifications and standards that drive that.

  • zd9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It would be real easy to fix the problem. There’s a handful of people controlling these industries.

      • Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yes they all involve less consumption, but the ones that actually are serious have that reduced consumption as a by-product of regulating industries that are the biggest offenders. You can’t “personal responsibility” your way out of climate change. That doesn’t mean people shouldn’t take responsibility, but they should realize that personal responsibility alone cannot solve this.

  • o1011o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Many things follow this pattern, but not all. It’s important to recognize when you’re being fed outright lies by the real villains and when you’re actually part of the problem. Don’t pretend corporations are solely to blame if those corporations can only do what they do because you willfully pay them for it. When they have a monopoly on necessary goods, sure, they’re entirely the bad guys. When they would do harm whether or not you pay them, same thing. But don’t act like the corp is the bad guy and you’re the poor little victim if you’re choosing to empower the bad guys when you have the option to spend your money ethically instead.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We do not choose to exist within capitalism, nor do the working classes control the state in capitalism. People do not choose to empower corporations, their control of capital and the state is what gives them power.