• ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    1 month ago

    He really wasn’t. As more offline people found out who he was, it quickly became clear that most people found him repulsive.

      • ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 month ago

        With Trump, people either idolize or loath him. With Charlie Kirk, people either kinda like him or loath him. There’s a significant difference.

        • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I feel like most people looked at Charlie Kirk and thought, “I probably would have bullied him if we had gone to high school together.”

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        Experts often say that Trump is somehow unique, but I’ve never understood that idea. If anything, he seems far less impressive to me than a typical politician, due to his constantly broadcasting his low intelligence.

        Anyways, I hope he is unique, since he’s old and unhealthy. He’ll personally be out of our hair pretty soon.

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 month ago

          His low intelligence is the reason so many people love him. Well, not that specifically, but because he talks in a way they understand. The same way they talk. Combined with the belief that being rich (even if it’s a farce) must inherently mean someone knows what they are doing, and you get where we are now.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          No one claimed uniquely impressive. Trump is unique in somehow acquiring a cult-like following that is also fine with him violating what they claim are their principals and their own best interests, and even in the face of denying reality. I’ve never understood it - have they ever listened to him speak? Even before the evilness of his actions, how the heck are they hearing anything positive? Anything they wish to applaud or follow? Yet they do.

          I seriously hope Trump is unique. His personality cult has somehow immunized him from limits and consequences, and we really cannot afford another.

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    Want really his trajectory anyway.

    Way easier to just cash in from the sidelines and take the profits without the potential accountability of actually being in any office.

    Most celebrity commentators never go anywhere near an actual office. Whether they be left or right.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        You are right, I tell you who would be able to take it, is RFK, but his voice is a real deal breaker for the base? hard to give a nazi speech with that impediment. Vance was chosen because he’s unlikable, so the president wouldn’t be shunted aside for him.

        Who else do they have? Kirk really could’ve had a real chance, barring any repudiation of Israel’s plans for his organization that he spurned, along with their board p[r]icks for his own vision.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        We have seen pop media people move over, Trump, Schwarzenegger, Reagan, but at least so far it’s not been, ironically enough, political celebrities. They seem to prefer commentating from the sidelines rather than being in the thick of things. Easier to always be ‘correct’ when you are not actually accountable for your ideas.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Were you expecting different? Because that is exactly what I expect.

      I also agree with him, by the way, Erika Kirk is a fucking ghoul that might actually be worse than Charlie.

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    This isn’t discussed nearly enough. He was 100% groomed to be the next president. Do any of you actually understand Charlie Kirk would have been the American president. That is not talked about enough. Fun to laugh at, sure. But it was an actual reality. There were a lot of eggs in that basket. I can’t prove it, but the assignation of Charlie Kirk may have significantly saved a lot of lives.

  • andz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That guy couldn’t argue his points properly with students half his age and he had the charisma of an orthopedic sloth. Future president my ass.

    There’s a reason his chosen format was what it was. The single biggest contribution to conservatism he ever did was get shot. Other than that one defining incident he mattered to them about as much a housefly.

    • Knightfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The thing with politics today is that most of the time the hosts of the debate don’t have the courage to enforce the rules of debate. If you talk out of turn they should turn your mic off and verbally scold you. Shut your mouth or else we will end this debate and give the remainder of this time to your opponent without any censor.

  • thax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    These snakes make my skin crawl. It’s like my irish catholic upbringing has re-emerged as a global tempest. Believers terrify me in chaotic environs.