I support this so much, however due to work, I can not get away from Android/iOS. Many companies want you to install Microsoft Authenticator with this generally wanting to prompt you for MFA authorisation when accessing company resources. On top of this they often want you running Company Portal on your device too if you’re accessing resources such as emails or IM
Then they need to give you a work phone.
My personal phone is rooted. I couldn’t access anything work related (beyond authenticator) on it even if I wanted to.
Now, why not just fork AOSP a la grapheneos?
Why we always have to invent something new? Why not just take the fork in the road and go build something better from it?
Thinking modern os, not even google has been able to do it (fuchsia).
IMO one of the greatest parts of a pure linux phone is that nothing is new. It runs the same apps as my desktop and works in the same way, so I don’t have to learn two sets of apps. Other than stuff like call management and Phosh, the desktop environment I use that’s tailored for small screens, I run all pre-existing software like systemd, wayland, firefox, nautilus, etc. IMO the biggest hurdle is hardware support, since only a few phones are able to run pure linux, and even on those few, there are still many parts of the hardware that are not supported.
I assume, part of the changes Android has, would be more ways to reduce standby battery drain, tuned to mobile phones?
And maybe their alternative for systemd is more suitable for mobile phones.And since I irrationally favour Linux, perhaps we can come up with a
systemd-mobile, tuned for RISK and ARM based mobile-phone systems, which keeps in mind, power used by cell-radio, WiFi modules, etc.
But of course, first and foremost, we need to have a standardised pre-boot system, like we have for PCs, making it much easier to manage development, without piling up plastic and Silicon paperweights.
Google is becoming more and more a pain the as releasing AOSP. And they’re migrating towards more and more proprietary. I think the worry here is having the work power to keep it updated and maintained.
I’m guessing the idea is that with this effort, it makes more sense to migrate to Linux phones instead.
Pretty much. Google does a lot of heavy lifting, and they have a lot more pull with companies, which is why Android works now.
It really is too bad that Google didn’t have to move Android to the Linux Foundation and make it a true community project.
Dreaming about this since more than a decade. My issues are banking apps, health related apps and basically anything somewhat official. A lot of them won’t even work on a rooted Android device. How are things looking in that regard with Linux phone projects?
I’m not really sure the state of things, but what if Linux phones containerized Android apps so they’d appear to be on a non-rooted device?
The GAPPS image on WayDroid is pretty alright. I’m using it on my Linux desktop to play some mobile games. I understand it should be able to support MS Authenticator. But getting the camera to work is pretty hacky so certain functions don’t work for me yet.
We’ve been ‘setting up the ground work’ for Linux on Desktop and Phones for decades. It’s not the groundwork that’s the issue, it’s adoption.
bruh Linux phones don’t even standby working ffs.
deleted by creator
Every android kernel takes Linux and makes it closed source when the code is included to make it work with the hardware.
deleted by creator
And? Do you want a Linux phone or an open hardware phone. One might happen the other not in anything people would want to use.
So who is the strongest contender here? I hear stuff about pinephone, then nothing. Fairphone, more silence. Purism, so much silence.
I will happily pay someone now for a half decent phone so that by the time android is fully enshittified we all have a place to go.
Here are the big Linux phone contenders that I’ve found:
I think the only promising one these days is the Furilabs FLX1, but it’s definitely good to keep an eye out for how things progress from here.
I had not heard of furi labs until now. I do have some concerns that they operate out of hong Kong, have no published corporate structure or stated ownership and that they are able to produce something so far ahead of any competitors.
It smells like its got a lot of money and resources into it and I’d really like to know who is funding it.
They show one employee on LinkedIn and no job postings. Company size is 2-10 people.
When something seems too good to be true, it probably is. Purism sells their phones for 2x the cost, theyre huge and half-done. I would wager that they are a more realistic representation of where the market really is.
One of the developers used to work (maybe a lead?) on Droidian(/maybe Waydroid; I don’t remember, unfortunately) so part of the advancement probably has to do with already having familiarity of the problem-space.
Also, Purism is trying to serve up entirely libre hardware whereas FuriLabs is using Halium to simplify how well things work in the hardware.
So of course Purism is having a much harder time with things.
