• OboTheHobo@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I really hope valve can get VAC into a good space so it can be an example of doing anti-cheat well without having to be a rootkit. Looks like we’re heading towards that point. Hopefully this change will last

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      John Macdonald is cooking the best fucking server-sided anticheat with all that compute power in Bellevue. Lets see him become a master chef!

      • OboTheHobo@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve been thinking for a while we need more server side stuff. No worries about infringing on the consumers computer then. Hopefully that ends up becoming something good!

  • Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve often thought that the cheaters should be simply shadow banned, and only match with other cheaters. Let them play against the other cheaters and see how well they do.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I always thought there should be an “unlimited class” in the olympics where you can take anything you want. I want to see wildly drugged up athletes competing with each other.

  • goodnighttothe_spoon@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    OMG thank God, finally VAC is working??? The cheating was getting so bad. I kick and report people as much as I can but it felt like it never did anything.

    Knowing this, I am not as upset about getting caught in the crossfire the other day. VAC flagged my game session after like 2 seconds and I had to reinstall completely.

    I should go read some of these cheater forums and maybe talk a little shit. Little fuckers.

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      During a GDC conference held by John Macdonald (Engineer largely in the data side of Valve’s affairs), he stated that the training of VACnet was largely a “war of datasets”, and he expected the quality to improve as time went on and Valve labelled and processed more internal data for their anticheat.

      Considering the leak for “referring to your training manual” for the employee-access version of Overwatch match reporting for CS2 might be an indicator that they were labelling the data the whole time with contractors. Now seems to be the release moment :)

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I did finally win a match in CS2 after a long loss streak… it was definitely because everyone else was always cheating… not because I’m shit…

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hypothesis: people who cheat in video games are scum bags in other aspects of life. I wonder if anyone’s done a study on that. I feel like the kind of person who has to cheat in video games is a broken sad sack.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ha! Get fucked, losers. Cheaters ruin the fun for everyone, so I hope every last one gets permabanned.

    • tequinhu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You cannot permaban a cheater for the saame reason you shouldn’t have death penalty, people need to be able to challenge the decision which should trigger a process

      As a piece of software, I highly doubt there isn’t a single bug in VAC that would cause a false-positive

      • groet@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        When you suspect someone of being highly dangerous you put them in jail even if they are not convicted yet. And when it turns out they are innocent they are released.

        A ban is like jail not like a death sentence …

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nobody can have proof of that, because no such proof can ever exist. How would you ever have a proven correct number of cheaters not detected?

        • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It can be tested in closed systems but it’s not something you can easily define the success rate of because the cheats are constantly evolving and game updates close or introduce vulnerabilities.

          There is still value of having an anti-cheat even if it does not have a high chance of catching cheaters, so long as it keeps false positives to a minimum.

            • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              You can die in a car accident, even if you wear a seat belt.

              LOL what’s the value of a seatbelt? You’re either very dull or a troll. Maybe both.

                • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You failed to understand the parallel between my example and the topic at hand, so I’m proud to announce that you’ve passed the idiot test with flying colors!

                  Pro tip: apples and oranges can be compared and contrasted. They have a large variety of similarities and differences.