• @spacesatan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      892 months ago

      Have to respect someone getting in on grifting conservatives without even endorsing their views in the process.

      • @Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        282 months ago

        Honestly, there’s and endless sea of grift attempts going on at all times. You don’t think people selling fake gold Trump coins, etc give one damn about his politics, do you? They’re just trying to wring every penny out of the die hards

          • @Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 months ago

            Right? I was going to sell 5g blockers online when the pandemic started, but I have some semblance of a conscience… Also my wife threatened to leave me if I did.

            • @Ziglin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              I read that as 5 grams and wondered what a blocker was that 5g worth of it would be extra valuable during the pandemic.

        • @Phen@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          192 months ago

          Last presidential election here in Brazil there were some some traffic light salesman selling towels with the presidential candidates. And they walked around with a score board showing which one had sold more. And they sold a lot more because people didn’t want to see their beloved candidate on the losing side.

        • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 months ago

          I have to respect the mall t-shirt kiosks selling poorly made trump merch right next to the equally poorly made Kamala merch. At least they’re just there for the hustle

      • @Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        132 months ago

        In this case they do very much help those views though. Either they create the appearance of public appeal, which draws more people to these views, or they manage to disrupt spaces that formerly fostered a different political culture.

        If we look at Twitter we see the second aspect particularly strongly.

    • @apt8@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      112 months ago

      Thats exactly what I believe. I know there is no limits to stupidity, but don’t you use bots to make it seem legit? Who would go around saying, “hey guys we’re losing. We should use BOTS. We should buy BOTS ACCOUNT AND UPVOTES from BOTSFORSALE.org

    • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      I mean, it’s an ad but it’s also thought-provoking and interesting. Before now we all knew what was happening we just didn’t know the details also kind of interesting to see proof it’s a conversation starter. I think I would have preferred it if the author would have redacted the URL though.

  • partial_accumen
    link
    fedilink
    1992 months ago

    “It is unambiguous clear that our message is toxic and the majority of people reject our ideology and us with it. Therefore, the most logical solution is to create an artificial narrative via manipulation and vote-buying that makes it appear that people like us.” -these people probably

            • @TommySoda@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              27
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Holy shit you’re not wrong. I just browsed the top of the week on World News for a good twenty minutes and there wasn’t a single post about the thousands of civilians that have been killed. I didn’t see a single pro Palestine post and anybody talking about the literal war crimes being committed over there we’re just downvoted. I think I agree with your word choice of “surreal.” It feels like straight up propaganda and they are all falling for it. Every post about Israel was just saying something about how they’re taking out the terrorists.

            • @Clbull@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              20
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              It’s hilariously ironic that I got banned from worldnews four years ago for criticizing the Saudi regime and how they use millennia-old scripture as justification to treat women horribly. Apparently that’s ‘bigotry.’

              Everything I hear about the toxicity of worldnews these days is baffling.

              • @Saleh@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                92 months ago

                Well, Saudi Arabia is an ally in all but name to Israel. Also both countries have excellent ties to large swaths of US politics.

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      fedilink
      112 months ago

      That’s what they’ve been doing for decades. And unfortunately they’ve been very successful at it.

  • @Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1272 months ago

    “Our opinions are wildly unpopular to the point where even if a bunch of us showed up we’d struggle to make a difference so we’re gunna need to buy upvotes!”

    Like…c’mon.

    • @LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      29
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The right may not have good ideas, organizational skills, charm, ethics, understanding of economics, history, or politics, or strength in numbers, but they do have the one thing more important than all of these.

      Money!

      • @Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        72 months ago

        I’d argue they do have organizational skills and and strength in numbers. Don’t underestimate that.

        • @OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 months ago

          Eric Trump says “what?!”

          img

          And this after his father would have made 8 times more money by simply leaving it in the bank than all of his variety of hotel and Sharper Image steak sales businesses - he’s literally the only one I’ve ever heard of who managed to lose money running a casino!

          “The system” is what makes wealth, not individual people these days. Obviously not solely, but the above example shows how it is the primary determination factor.

  • @OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    802 months ago

    Gasp, you all surely don’t believe that conservatives would ever engage in voter manipulation tactics… r-r-right!?

      • @OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        This must be why Trump said they people only need to vote one more time, and then they’ll never need to do so ever again.

        One election, to rule them all… and in the darkness bind them

  • @Zess@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    762 months ago

    This is what they do in real life too though. They know the US is mostly liberal (based on the popular vote) so they have to abuse money and historical power to manipulate the votes into their favor.

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    652 months ago

    Probably a scam, but congrats on discovering the Russian disinformation strategy from 2016.

    • 🔍🦘🛎
      link
      fedilink
      English
      332 months ago

      Not exactly a scam. I still browse Reddit, and the Jordan Peterson Memes sub has been popping up in Popular for a few weeks, it had been a completely obscure sub before. The posts are ALL about US politics too…on a meme sub for a Canadian ‘life coach’

      • @Dempf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        232 months ago

        That’s because Jordan Peterson is one of the entry points to the alt-right rabbit hole. Despite being from Canada, his brand of grift is intricately tied to U.S. politics. If you have a very short amount of time, some people have put together some very short videos talking about Peterson:

        https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIK-x5uT6oS9EnO9-D6ePsWKOxtFhDZdF

        https://youtu.be/hSNWkRw53Jo

        https://youtu.be/fWUAGfduUlg

        https://youtu.be/CvH0Pkw_iCg

        https://youtu.be/m81q-ZkfBm0

        https://youtu.be/s1FkO7Tr70A

        • 🔍🦘🛎
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 months ago

          Oh I’m definitely aware. The fact that some anti-woke content appears on the sub isn’t unexpected. The fact that it’s largely US political content is just a blatant display of meddling.

      • @blarth@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        122 months ago

        Ender’s Game was prescient text, regardless of Orson Scott Card’s personal beliefs.

        Locke and Demosthenes are now armies of manipulative bots (but often real humans), shaping political discourse throughout the world. The Internet gave mind control powers to people with money, ambition, or both. We saw it with the Bernie Sanders and Trump movements in 2016 on Reddit, all too clearly for those who lived through an era where bullshit detection was a critical skill.

        I was once fairly defeatist on this subject: the bad guys won, got Trump elected, and kicked off a new era of 80s conservatism that demonized progressive values like environmental conservation, freedom of choice in a number of matters, and equality.

        But now, I’m starting to see young people stand up to their boomer relatives at Thanksgiving and bring facts and logic to social media discussions. And I have regained some hope that we will once again find a way to make the progressive “line go up“. Our society seems to swing like a pendulum between the right and left, over decades, and it feels like the Trump era was a swing too violent for most of us. It’s time to swing back.

        • Man, ever since the early 2010s I’ve thought about Ender’s Game a LOT - and it’s always this part of the book, never the zero-g laser tag or genocide-by-arcade-machine parts.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -10
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      the Russian disinformation strategy

      I’ll never understand why people attribute to the Russian government what was in the obvious best-interests of the Republican Party and the conservative movement.

      If you asked who owns and operates the FOX News Channel, or Sinclair Media, or Clear Channel Radio, or any of the other dozen right-wing propaganda projects, I have to wonder how many people would reflexively insist “Russia” despite all of the money spilling in from the UK, Australia, Canada, Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and the O&G Industry.

      • @bobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’ll never understand why people attribute to the Russian government what was in the obvious best-interests of the Republican Party and the conservative movement.

        Maybe because there was a demonstrated and provable coordinated effort by the Russian government in the 2016 election to get Trump elected? Look up project lakhta. Russian election interference and the efforts of the domestic conservative movement can (and do) exist simultaneously.

        What do you have against attributing to the Russian government actions that are demonstrably attributable to the Russian government?

        • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -12 months ago

          I’ll be real, I have my suspicions regarding that whole scandal in 2016 because following the election there were like 2-3 days of quiet introspection by the Dems and then they aligned on “the Russians were pushing fake news that tricked everyone!”

          My pet conspiracy theory is that it was already known within the political campaigns that these misinformation campaigns were happening and they chose to at that point publicize them and use that as their scapegoat. Same with the Russian spies they publicly outed that trump spoke with.

          • @bobo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            52 months ago

            My pet conspiracy theory is that it was already known within the political campaigns that these misinformation campaigns were happening and they chose to at that point publicize them and use that as their scapegoat. Same with the Russian spies they publicly outed that trump spoke with.

            Your framing is off. It’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s true that it was already known. The FBI investigation of Russian interference began before the election, not after. The investigation was being publicized before the election.

            If you want to nurse a conspiracy theory about it, whatever. But you’re going to appear ignorant when you advance a conspiracy theory without doing the bare minimum of research into the known facts. You’re just creating a fictional narrative based on your “suspicions.” You’re not being “real.” You’re being ignorant.

            • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -22 months ago

              I called it a conspiracy theory because it’s really just based purely off of observation and gut instinct and not facts. Good to know my gut instinct happened to be right though!

              • @bobo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                62 months ago

                Your takeaway from my reply is that your instinct was correct? You’re going to make a great conspiracy theorist.

                • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  Meh my “conspiracy theories” just aren’t exciting enough because they tend to be too grounded in things that are actually likely in the real world and explaining weirdness in what is presented to the public with a guess as to what happened behind the scenes, like that the sonic movie was a joke pitch that somehow got greenlit so then they had to actually make the movie and to try to make it decent

      • Because there have been literal articles and reports by the FBI that Russian interference in social media has been a thing since the 2016 election cycle.

        That’s why it’s been attributed to the Russian government. Because the Russian government actually did a ton of stuff.

        • @GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          They were at it at least a year before the 2016 election cycle. I believe it was the CIA that said Russia was the one that created the Jade Helm scare in 2015 through social media influence.

          Jade Helm was the name of a training operation of the US military in central TX near Temple. The Russians created a bunch of posts claiming that Obama was taking over local Walmarts and emptying them of all merchandise to use as prisoners for his political opponents. They even drew diagrams of the insides of the stores with the holding cells and everything. So great was the Russian influence that Abbott (who is still Governor of TX) ordered the TX National Guard to watch the training exercise and make sure that the US military wasn’t storming homes and taking prisoners.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -22 months ago

          there have been literal articles and reports by the FBI that Russian interference

          There have been literal articles and reports by the FBI of domestic white nationalist organizing and domestic financing. Significantly more money and manpower is documented as entirely domestically organized, although a sizeable amount is moving between NATO and other Five Eyes states. We’re talking on the scale of tens of billions moving between domestic financiers - like the Mercers, Thiel, the Kochs, etc - and domestic fascist media/organizing. That dwarfs Russian state interventions. Its orders of magnitude different.

          That’s why it’s been attributed to the Russian government.

          Why do you search for the speck in your neighbor’s eye when you have a plank within your own?

  • @umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    612 months ago

    Hey, remember what happened to Digg? Why a bunch of people moved over to Reddit in the first place?

    I guess not a lot of people remember, so let me tell you.

    Bunch of dipshits ran upvote brigades. Stories they didn’t like got buried really fast.

    Now, Digg was a hive mind site to begin with - good luck posting anything the hive mind didn’t care about. But add blatant political machinations on top of that, and the site got unusable real fast.

    Take a few guesses which political views those groups were trying to futilely promote while quashing opponents. Go on. (I’ll give a hint, some of them retreated to Conservapedia)

    So that’s what killed Digg. …that, and the Digg admins were being dicks and the site redesign sucked ass. (…insert comparison to modern Reddit here)

    • @Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      82 months ago

      I don’t remember Digg being infiltrated by right wing conservatives. What I do remember was a website with a community that dickrode its power users so hard that unless you were a figure like MrBabyMan, your content would not get a single vote. The only people who actually used Digg’s social features (i.e. Friends lists) were blog spammers.

      IIRC Digg v4 tried to address the issue by making users subscribe directly to news websites and dedicated content creators. They hated it and flocked immediately to their competitor.

      Reddit has the same power user problem, albeit 1000x worse. Say what you want about the people who gamed Digg’s front-page, but they didn’t have the power to be judge, jury and executioner when moderating communities.

    • @Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      72 months ago

      That’s only part of what killed Digg. The final nail in the coffin was when they redesigned the website to give power users even more power to control the front page than they already had.

      • @umbraroze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        42 months ago

        Yep, as I tried to hint in the last paragraph. 😆

        Digg’s biggest sin was that the votes were all that mattered, and the admins just leaned into that by coddling the power users. That’s why Digg got so toxic to random people who just wanted to share something cool they found. The last redesign just made it official that there are those whose votes matter and the unwashed plebs. Everyone already knew people were fucking with the votes, and the admins just said “go right ahead”.

        So what Reddit offered was at least some assurance that the algorithm would combat blatant vote manipulation by power blocs and that people could share cool stuff fairly. Digg users promptly voted with their feet.

        Now, to Reddit’s credit, the system worked for years. Admins absolutely condemned vote manipulation and actively fought it. People were actively against all sorts of vote brigading, and the admins listened.

        Problem is, it all changed. Corporate media influencing came in, under radar. Political memefluencers came in, under radar. It’s all allowed unless it’s blatantly against policy and everyone pretends it’s just organic random users.

        Now, you don’t see the Reddit admins talking about what made the site work so well back in the day. I’m not sure they’re interested in maintaining the anti-brigading and anti-manipulation algorithms. They’re this close to saying “fuck it, it’s a free-for-all” and going full Digg publicly.

        • @gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          42 months ago

          lmao even if that happens i fucking bet NOTHING will change. too many people are just addicted to the site and even if it does we’ll just get an overload of turbo-redditors here

    • @auzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      32 months ago

      That’s not what happened at all imho.

      What killed digg realistically is that it had less control than Reddit and because Kevin Rose blocked posts about the DVD encryption codes and people over reacted to that block. For days digg was full of people simply reposting them (as Digg was worried about getting sued which was fair enough)

      Didn’t really have anything to do with politics.

      Don’t forget, this was back in the day of fat people hate and Reddit hosting child porn. Reddit administration was never great

      Digg admins were actually ok and I never had an issue with them

      • @ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        Don’t forget, this was back in the day of fat people hate and Reddit hosting child porn. Reddit administration was never great

        Reddit in the earliest days was basically 4chan but less controlled and more spread-out. There were thousands of illegal and horrifyingly abusive subreddits. Every single time one got taken down, it was this massive, whinging drama show from thousands of chuds screaming about their “rights” and “censorship.”

        By the time admins came for the less overtly evil ones, like the weirdly prevalent communities dedicated to fantasizing about punching particular people in the face, reddit had very much become the WalMart of the internet. Not the cleanest or nicest place to visit, but it certainly had everything and was convenient if you needed a fix at odd hours.

        I don’t even remember Digg but I remember it seemed relatively short-lived in the early days of the explosion of forum sites. A lot of people were trying to strike gold with the next big thing as internet popularity was soaring. There are likely hundreds of other big sites like Digg that people used to frequent that have also since died in the mass-extinction events of the 2010’s and beyond.

  • @OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    582 months ago

    That’s pretty much US politics summed up, isn’t it? Ignore what they people say and throw money into it to get what you want.

    • @CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      Yep, it’s the same formula for commercials and fliers you see. Just on Reddit, they have to prep to fight back because people can actively voice their opinions where billboards/fliers/commercials, they don’t have to deal with that.

  • @Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    56
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Everyone with a Reddit account, let’s sell upvotes to conservatives on Jordan_Peterson_Memes. It’s income redistribution with zero impact.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Subvert the will and desires of the majority

      Come on, dude. This is Reddit, not a vote in parliament. The site’s entire business model revolves around astroturfing.

      • Darth_Mew
        link
        fedilink
        01 month ago

        this is not reddit. nor was the screenshot from reddit so you make no sense. you are blaming what they say on reddit yet they are just saying let’s do this on reddit.

  • @PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    38
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Remember guys “no brigading” is only a reddit-wide rule and does not apply to brigade efforts that originate from outside of reddit. Also, koboldcpp is great for self-hosted text generation ai. I don’t know who needs to read this so go crazy with that information.

  • @chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    362 months ago

    Counter argument: Reddit is predominately American. These upvote sites use low cost foreign slave labor to generate their output. Buying upvotes is outsourcing jobs. Keep Reddit American. Don’t buy upvotes!