• (Not you OP, you = governments)

    You want to block corporate social media sites as propaganda

    I want to block corporate social media sites because they’re parasites on society.

    We are not the same.

    • @PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Im actually quite upset that lawmakers havent used this to pass generalized privacy protection.

      They have an opportunity to end mass survailance, but thats OK if its US survailance

      • @Land_Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Our tools of social connection vs their tools of propaganda.

        Now fill in the possessive pronouns with either country and change them depending on the specific tool used.

      • @rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I don’t care what they are. I just think the internet in its current state sucks and I like the idea of there being less of it.

    • @lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      What sucks is I’ve imagined a social media platform that was built with good intentions to actually better being people together and make their lives better. It’s one of the worst missed opportunities in recent memory.

        • @bouh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          So you don’t ridiculise your country by promoting freedom of trade but seizing the assets of the countries you don’t like when it’s a better tech than yours.

            • @Fedizen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              our most and least popular politician is a sex predator who earned all his money by his dad dying and is currently at risk of losing his money because he can’t stop lying about things.

              The greatest monument to american shamelessness is Donald J Trump.

          • @duffman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I’m not with my government on a lot of things they do. I want the same data rights and restrictions to apply to all companies that host people’s personal information.

            But what’s this about Impressive tech? Tiktoc? First that’s laughable, even more laughable is how you phrase is as if anyone would give a fuck if another country had some better tech. Sounds like you are projecting your own insecurities.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          It will be just as easy for them, just less profitable. Now they’ll just pay Zuckerberg or Musk for the information. If they aren’t already.

      • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        And it’s not like they can’t maintain use of the thing while not being owners. Come on. Like there’s some magic rule if a company’s not owned by China, it can’t be used as a Chinese intelligence source? Come on.

        If social media is in cahoots with foreign intelligence, there are better ways to handle it in my opinion.

      • @Rinox@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Yeah, you are right. They should do like they do in China, sell to a JV with a local company at fire sales price… Oh wait

        • sell to a JV with a local company at fire sales price

          The Chinese policy is to share ownership with locals, so that a firm isn’t simply extracting wealth from the Chinese market.

          The American policy is to seize a pre-existing firm after it has developed, by accusing its Singapore founder of being a secret Chinese Communist.

      • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Lmao, the USA doesn’t operate the commercial sector outside of power, trains, rockets, and planes. It won’t benefit from the sale in any way other than lowering Chinese involvement.

        • @Filthmontane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          The US government works for the billionaires that run the economy. Many billionaires want to buy tiktok. In fact, there’s already teams of people set up for buying out tiktok. The government is just the tool for the hostile acquisition. No one said the US government is directly purchasing tiktok.

          • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            The US Government and Billionaires are opposing forces, one political party wants to tax billionaires while the other is on the payroll.

            • @tbs9000@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              They’re not at all opposing forces. Some billionaires are in competition with each other and political parties are tools at certain billionaires disposal.

              The act of taxing income is but one political mechanism used to influence the power of some billionaires over another.

                • @tbs9000@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  I’m not sure I understand your question. They are both pro-government. If any one human could be the personification of government, it would be the President of the United States.

  • @Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My self hosted DNS does all of that banning too. But that’s just my little quality of life thing (and whatever little that does fighting the global data overlords).

    • @AeonFelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      The fine line between “I don’t want to do the thing” and “I don’t want you to be able to do the thing”.

      • @Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Yes.

        But it’s a blurred lines between having to do something or being pressured or heavily encouraged to do something (otherwise you are left out of an important social system).

        I’m totally agreeing with you, just adding that sometimes infrastructure matters (as it gives little choice to population) & can be especially bad if there is a single entity behind it with it’s own agenda not aligned with users interests (eg for profit companies, or in this case I guess geopolitical stuff too).

  • @IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    China controls speech to Censor Genocide : boooo

    America controls speech to Censor Genocide : yaaaay

    The irony of America doing exactly the same censorship as China when the roles are reversed, and people are cheering it on as if it’s some gocha

  • @TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    Honestly the brain dead obvious political move outside of monied interests is strong legislation to protect peoples information.

    But we won’t see that

  • @manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    I hate tiktok

    but all these talks about keeping children off phones is restricting the flow of information to a point that it scares me. we have Enciclopedias in our pockets ffs.

    if the bar kids from easily accessing the internet, they’re effectively blocking 2mil people (14-17) from instant access to information. (I did some sleep deprived math, dont @me if its off)

    • @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      As far as I know, there’s no legislation being talked about to keep kids off their phones, or even social media. This is more of a concern about China having unfettered access to user data at the drop of a hat, which I can absolutely agree is an issue. Though I don’t know that current legislation is the solution.

      That said, kids absolutely do need to spend more time off their phone than they do. We’ve seen legitimate issues arise from perpetual phone use. The issue is… you can’t really legislate that. It’s parents that need to get their heads out of the sand and actually parent.

  • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    A FORCED SALE IS NOT A BAN.

    I’ve said this like a thousand times and I hate repitition, but the USA as a whole has never tried to ban TikTok. Trump claims he did, it isn’t allowed for military servicemembers, but it has never been banned.

    • @Jyek@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Forced sale only works if your government has any control over the organizational structure of your company which the USA does not. What they are effectively doing is forcing the American arm of Tik Tok to sell without access to it’s technology which China can absolutely deny. If the sale doesn’t go through, the US will ban its use. If they do sell, it will be without the technology and a company will be Tik Tok in name only having to essentially build the service from the ground up. This is an effective ban of Tik Tok regardless of the outcome.

      • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        What makes you think the proprietary rights held by the Chinese hold any sway in the USA? If they want to try suing they can, heck they can even take it to international courts, but they won’t have much luck given the evidence that China was using it maliciously.

        • @Jyek@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          What I mean is, there is no way the Chinese headquarters of tik Tok will let the America arm of the company have access to its algorithm. Tik Tok is nothing without its algorithm. At best it’s a large install base that will dwindle once they realize til Tok kinda sucks all of a sudden.

          • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh that would be interesting, it seems very uneconomic for it to be that centralized because the US facilities would be useless but I suppose I could see it as a possibility. In that case, whoever they sell to could try to sue them with pretty unlikely odds of success. More likely China would just refuse to sell in that circumstance, in which case it would be the same as China themselves ending TikTok.

  • @Scrof@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    TikTok is literally a weapon created and used to undermine the USA (among other democracies but mainly USA) and to brainwash its citizens. Anyone who doesn’t see it is a useful idiot who bought into Chinese propaganda.