I didn’t see this coming and I think it’s funny, so I decided to post it here.

  • @Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    125 days ago

    Things won’t be simpler just because you cut everything up in tiny tiny pieces (I mean it will be easier because it solves some surface level problem right now, pushing the real problem down the road), it creates a complexity of its own.

      • @Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        024 days ago

        It’s easy to say I didn’t read your message, which I obviously did (why write lies like that?), just because you don’t understand my point.

        • @tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          119 days ago

          Because I clearly said that you don’t cut up things into tiny pieces. It was both in the first paragraph in my post and the last one. I said you use tiny functions to glue together larger systems. So yeah you clearly didn’t read what I wrote.

          • @Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            119 days ago

            Micro services is already cutting stuff up in small pieces lol.

            The opposite us monolithic software.

            • @tyler@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              117 days ago

              I literally didn’t mention micro services at all. So once again it’s very clear you didn’t read what I wrote. And no, that’s not what micro services are. Smdh.

              • @Valmond@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                Who cares if you mentioned it? Don’t you know what microservices are?

                You seem to just want to be “right”, so sure continue with your new “nano services” if that’s your thing, sheesh. Just watch out for those pico-services.