• @PumpkinDrama@reddthat.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    272 months ago

    I once read that there are some states in the U.S. where firefighters don’t put out fires in houses that don’t pay a monthly subscription.

    • @LrdThndr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      352 months ago

      I live in an area with a subscription fire service.

      It’s not expensive - around $200/year. And if you don’t have a subscription they still come and put out your fire or cut you out of the car or whatever needs to be done. You just get a bill for $3000/hr/apparatus that responds.

      But I still find it abhorrent. Just put it in my fucking taxes and be done with it. Jesus.

      • @Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        182 months ago

        I live in an area with a subscription fire service.

        I thought the earlier guy was doing a joke. I knew that those were a thing in the 1800’s or something, but even today?

        You just get a bill for $3000/hr/apparatus that responds.

        That’s pretty insane. So basically the firemen and ambulances are too expensive for the average citizen to use, and if you happen to be black, you probably don’t want to call the cops either.

        Great services.

        Ameeerica, fuck yeah!

    • @Crotaro@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      Not sure about the modern equivalents to this, but in Rome (please correct if wrong) it used to be like that. Firefighters would only put out fires of houses that paid them and otherwise just stood there, watching.

      At least that’s what I read in one of those “did you know this about the ancient cultures?” articles and those aren’t always reliable either.