• @ulterno
    link
    English
    3
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Just tried. It processes the escape first and then finds the path with it. Essentially, making it look into a directory made by the characters before the \/.

    The above was when I tried:

    echo "asd" > asd\/dsa
    

    But then I tried using Dolphin (GUI File Browser) to make a file and:

    ls
     1   2   3   4  'asd\⁄sad.txt'ls
    1  2  3  4  asd⁄sad.txt
    

    In the first one, the backslash is not the escape character, but part of the text.

    Turns out Dolphin just replaces the forward slash with U+2044 “Fraction Slash” character, hence, not requiring any escape. I’d call that cheating, but it works well.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Turns out Dolphin just replaces the forward slash with U+2044 “Fraction Slash” character, hence, not requiring any escape. I’d call that cheating, but it works well.

      called it, i knew someone would use illegal characters eventually.

      • @ulterno
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I would have a problem if a terminal app were to do something like this, but for GUI apps, it is expected for them to make stuff easier.
        And I feel like, if you were to use a slash in a file name, it would most probably be either an “or” slash or a fraction slash, so the substitution is fine in my books.

        illegal characters

        Not sure about calling it that, considering it is a standard UTF-8 character. (0x2044 in UTF-16)

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          I would have a problem if a terminal app were to do something like this, but for GUI apps, it is expected for them to make stuff easier. And I feel like, if you were to use a slash in a file name, it would most probably be either an “or” slash or a fraction slash, so the substitution is fine in my books.

          it’s close enough, i generally consider an “illegal” character a non typable character. Especially these alt characters that are visually hard to distinguish from others such as the forward slash for example, i believe this was the same character used for a handful of somewhat clever phishing scams.

          Seems like it’s fair enough to me.