rhabarba to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 4 months agoRust in Linux lead retires rather than deal with more “nontechnical nonsense”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square213fedilinkarrow-up1449arrow-down112file-text
arrow-up1437arrow-down1external-linkRust in Linux lead retires rather than deal with more “nontechnical nonsense”arstechnica.comrhabarba to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square213fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePureTryOutlink14•4 months agoI mean, it is. RedoxOS is just that. But it’s not Linux and that means a lot of things.
minus-square@Telorand@reddthat.comlinkfedilink1•4 months agoMaybe this is the fork in the road for something new. These circumstances were kind of how GNU/Linux was born, after all.
minus-square@Giooschi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•4 months agoRust for Linux used to be developed in parallel to the mainline Linux before Linus Torvalds merged support in the main tree.
Why isn’t a Rust kernel being developed in parallel ?
I mean, it is. RedoxOS is just that. But it’s not Linux and that means a lot of things.
Maybe this is the fork in the road for something new. These circumstances were kind of how GNU/Linux was born, after all.
Rust for Linux used to be developed in parallel to the mainline Linux before Linus Torvalds merged support in the main tree.