• @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Republicans: Clearly Benjamin Franklin was woke, and probably a communist!

    (Because this would work against their efforts at book bans, their anti-trans crusade, their general anti-lgbtq+ crusade, their crusade against reproductive autonomy for women, and probably other things that aren’t immediately springing to mind.)

    • @dmention7@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      324 months ago

      I could be dead wrong, but I actually get the impression this wasn’t really meant in the modern colloquial sense of keeping your nose out of other people’s affairs, and more in the literal sense of keep on top of your business dealings. Which would make sense, since it was to be printed on money.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugio_cent

      • ✺roguetrick✺
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That sort of admonition would quickly be used as a mild insult though, no matter how literal. Same with something like “set your house in order” which is a biblical phrase with a very similar meaning to what Franklin was going for, as it’s related to there not being much time and Franklin relates his phrase to time flying. It’s too direct for English.

        I think both of them have a more specific meaning of something like a combination of “you’re the master of your own fate” and “seize the day.”

        • @sibannac@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          I think I remember reading about similar phrases telling the reader to be conscious of their mortal life on a bunch of old world clocks? Maybe he was influenced by those.

    • @JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      84 months ago

      Benjamin Franklin distributed a book containing basic first aid, which included which herbs can be used to “restore the menses.”

      Thats an old timey way of saying inducing an abortion. So you’re not that far off from what Republicans would say about him if they were actually educated.

    • LustyArgonian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      He was later anti-slavery so yes, many would consider him radical even by today’s standards (think of how people feel about prison reform, ask people how they’d fix homelessness or mental health crises, and you’ll see a shocking amount of people are 100% fine with slavery)