• @ulterno
          link
          English
          22 months ago

          Maybe your renderer?

            • @ulterno
              link
              English
              12 months ago

              I don’t get it.
              Are you replying to “Except fun fact…no.” - u/Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
              Or to my reply to it, that implies, maybe their renderer is non-standard and causing the backslashes to not work.

              \>\>:| --> >>:| works pretty well for me.

              • @NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                22 months ago

                this is a whole mess of confusion and miscommunication that probably absolutely no one cares about, and I for one am happy to just watch

                • @ulterno
                  link
                  English
                  22 months ago

                  I see, so the confusion is about whether u/Pyro@Programming.dev intended the double eyebrow or they made a mistake with that and are being corrected for it.

                  I thought they wanted the double eyebrow, because why would you put 2 if you only wanted one? And if you wanted the “quote” option, you would just not escape the leftmost “>”.


                  In case my above words are more confusing, Yes, it shows up as 2 sets of eyebrows for me too.
                  I thought that’s what the Thread Starter wanted.

                  CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

                  • @Gestrid@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    3
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    No, they were trying to make only one set of eyebrows appear. They tried fixing it by using two sets, thinking using one as a quote would make the other appear as a set of eyebrows. Instead, they got two quotes.

                    Also, you type usernames on Lemmy like this: @Pyro@programming.dev.