• Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      195 months ago

      Quantum computers won’t displace traditional computers. There’s certain niche use-cases for which quantum computers can become wildly faster in the future. But for most calculations we do today, they’re just unreliable. So, they’ll mostly coexist.

      • @UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        115 months ago

        In other words like GPUs. GPUs suck ass at complex calculations. They however, work great for a large number of easy calculations, which is what is needed for graphics processing.

      • Amanda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Presumably you’d have a QPU in your regular computer, like with other accelerators for graphics etc, or possibly a tiny one for cryptography integrated in the CPU

        • @Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          105 months ago

          There would have to be some kind of currently unforseen breakthroughs before something like that would be even remotely possible. In all likelihood, quantum computing would stay in specialized data centers. For the problems quantum would solve, there is really no advantage to having it local anyways.

          • Amanda
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            I assume we need a lot of breakthroughs to even have useful quantum computing at all, but sure.

            Isn’t quantum encryption interesting for end users?

            • @hades@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              55 months ago

              Quantum encryption isn’t something quantum computers can even do. It’s not just transforming bits into other bits, it’s about building entirely new security properties based on physical properties of matter.

              So, even if it is interesting for end users, they would need dedicated hardware anyway.