It looks like the internet archive is needed assistance, I just heard about this today and figured lemmy could help spread this message around

      • @Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It feels better than doing nothing.
        If you can convince yourself you’re not doing nothing.
        I’ve never been that good a liar.

        • @cybersin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          155 months ago

          I don’t know.

          I still think there’s at least some value, even if the only thing it accomplishes is getting people to talk about it. Many people have never even heard of The Internet Archive.

          Either way, there isn’t really a reason not to.

      • @grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Only things that are effective are better than doing nothing. Doing ineffective things only gives a false sense of accomplishment and thus reduces the incentive to try harder to be effective, which means they’re actually worse than doing nothing.

        Online petitions, “free speech zones,” and other easily-ignorable things are like honeypots for activism, designed to neuter it.

        • @cybersin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          45 months ago

          Sure, but “effectiveness” is usually not a binary and is often difficult to measure. Small, but persistent changes should still add up. Eventually.

          So long as people recognize that these things are in fact quite toothless, I’m not sure they are entirely detrimental. There’s no reason this couldn’t be used as a starting point for more effective action, now that signatories are in greater contact with the campaign.

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      105 months ago

      It’s not even a question of being “owned by corporations”. Judges don’t care about petitions. They’re not politicians, their job is to adjudicate the law.

      • @EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        In theory. In the US, at least (I don’t know about other countries), some judge positions are voted in, In that sense, they most certainly are politicians.

        On top of that, HAVE YOU SEEN OUR SUPREME COURT. THAT SHIT’S THE HALLMARK CHANNEL OF “OWNED BY OTHER ENTITIES”, be it actual politicians (Trump) or CEOs (also Trump), many of whom ARE both executives and politicans (again, not only Trump, but also a number of other reps & senators).