• @thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    95 months ago

    As someone who’s used their tooling and the generative tooling… I have to admit trying to push its limits for giggles. It is VERY conservative already so I don’t see why they’d need additional moderation privileges.

    This is an awful change.

    • @jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      I tried using their generative tools a while back and they were pretty terrible. Curious what your experience has been.

      • @thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The illustrator tools are terrible. But removing and replacing backgrounds in Photoshop has been spectacular with one caveat - they are less great if you give it any instruction. If you use the generative fills with prompts the results are not at all great. However, if you leave the prompt blank it does a bang-up job matching the existing background set / scene.

        Equally impressive has been generating parts of photos that are missing when extending the canvas size.

        It tends to work best with photos that are “inside” (interiors) with strong geometric cues - but it has expertly matched lighting, backgrounds and their level of focus (or lack thereof).

        • @jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          Thanks for the insight, I was using it to create something new from a prompt, so my bad experience seems to align with yours.