@kixik@lemmy.ml to LibreWolf @lemmy.ml • 1 month agoFirefox to collect your (anonymized) search datablog.mozilla.orgexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up172arrow-down12file-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlprivacyguides@lemmy.onefirefox@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up170arrow-down1external-linkFirefox to collect your (anonymized) search datablog.mozilla.org@kixik@lemmy.ml to LibreWolf @lemmy.ml • 1 month agomessage-square20fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlprivacyguides@lemmy.onefirefox@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-square@HouseWolf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish6•1 month agoI might be a bit out of the loop but I assumed the LibreWolf team already removes questionable code when building their fork?
minus-squarelemmyreaderlinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 month agoYes. My point was that by using Firefox ESR as base the update cycle would be much slower which I would welcome.
minus-squarelemmyreaderlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoFirefox ESR is like LTS. It would mean less work for LibreWolf maintainers and less upgrades for the users.
minus-squarekballinkfedilink2•1 month agoI find Firefox ESR much more relaxing to use than the version that springs new features and bugs on you randomly throughout the year.
I might be a bit out of the loop but I assumed the LibreWolf team already removes questionable code when building their fork?
Yes. My point was that by using Firefox ESR as base the update cycle would be much slower which I would welcome.
But what would be the benefit of that?
Firefox ESR is like LTS. It would mean less work for LibreWolf maintainers and less upgrades for the users.
I find Firefox ESR much more relaxing to use than the version that springs new features and bugs on you randomly throughout the year.