@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 7 months agoepidemiologymander.xyzimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1951arrow-down111
arrow-up1940arrow-down1imageepidemiologymander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 7 months agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-square@ulternolinkEnglish3•7 months agoI think they’re trying to say, it can be considered to be a non-accelerated reference frame, where stuff like planets and stars would be accelerated. Though I have a problem in understanding how it could be taken as a reference frame in the first place.
minus-squareJackGreenEarthlinkfedilinkEnglish2•7 months agoIndeed, it can’t be a reference frame, as even if it’s not accelerated, it’s everywhere, so it doesn’t have a position or orientation.
minus-square@ulternolinkEnglish1•7 months agoNot only that, it’s not even a single object. It’s just the name given to a group of radiation, which is ultimately just light going randomly here and there.
I think they’re trying to say, it can be considered to be a non-accelerated reference frame, where stuff like planets and stars would be accelerated.
Though I have a problem in understanding how it could be taken as a reference frame in the first place.
Indeed, it can’t be a reference frame, as even if it’s not accelerated, it’s everywhere, so it doesn’t have a position or orientation.
Not only that, it’s not even a single object. It’s just the name given to a group of radiation, which is ultimately just light going randomly here and there.