• @FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    17 months ago

    What I mean is that using the terminal isn’t mandatory in Manjaro while Arch and Arch based distros all require it. So for that it’s an excellent example.

    As for stability it’s a bit more stable than Arch itself from my experience but I still has issues. The most stable distro I have used was Pop OS, I didn’t have a single issue there for like 3 years straight, I only switched because of a hardware change and Pop OS’s Mesa version was unstable on the new hardware.

    My central point is still that you will never in a million years get the average computer user to use a terminal.

    • @Titou@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      07 months ago

      you will never in a million years get the average computer user to use a terminal.

      We used to back in the 20th century, when computer didn’t had GUI

        • @Titou@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          Yep as you said not everybody is made to use a computer, but everybody can learn how to with a minimum of will

            • @Titou@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              Im just saying everybody can learn basic terminal commands, because on Linux you’re on your own

              • @FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                17 months ago

                Yes, they can but an average user never will and for Linux to get any adoption beyond the enthusiast space it also can’t be a requirement.

                Like it’s fine if you believe Linux should never get mass adoption and be a niche desktop OS. All I’m saying is that I want Linux to get mass adoption and for that terminal usage can’t be a requirement because your average computer user, who’s most advanced computer use is installing an ad blocker on their browser, will never open a terminal.