For example, I’m using Debian, and I think we could learn a thing or two from Mint about how to make it “friendlier” for new users. I often see Mint recommended to new users, but rarely Debian, which has a goal to be “the universal operating system”.
I also think we could learn website design from… looks at notes …everyone else.

  • @rollingflowerDeutsch
    7•3 months ago

    Yes and I did a similar script but “just create a script” is a really bad solution.

    Apps should need to declare a shortname and flatpak should have a shortcut for those with a separated command like flatrun.

    • @thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      4•3 months ago

      I personally don’t think that creating a script is a bad solution. The entire Linux eco system is based around composable components (especially when we talk about terminal commands). Most of the Flatpak applications are available through GUI menus (.desktop files) and that’s the focus of Flatpak. And I think it’s a design decision not to expose every application as a separate program in the $PATH by default. This way there is less of a chance to collide with anything random on the system, if they have the same name.

      Having said this, I still agree it would be beneficial for most users if there was a way to automatically create scripts in a special bin folder, that is available in the $PATH. The problem is, what application name should it have? What about different versions of the same program? The entire Flatpak concept was not designed for this, so creating a script for your personal use is not a bad solution.

      • @rollingflowerDeutsch
        2•3 months ago

        Repeating, apps should need to declare a shortname. I think my script currently has no mechanism for detecting duplicates

        • @thingsiplay@beehaw.org
          4•3 months ago

          Please read my reply before you repeat. How should the different versions of an application be handled? What if the shortname is already taken? There will be collisions, which the longname tries to solve. Flatpak is not a repository where all names can be checked against, this is the job of a repository like Flathub. What about different versions of an application?

          This is not a simple case of forcing to specify shortnames.

    • _NoName_
      1•3 months ago

      I think a good solution would to just have that script autogenerated by the flatpak, honestly.

      • @rollingflowerDeutsch
        3•3 months ago

        That would mean the app has access to the path, which was explained as insecure in another place