• @Samueru@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    -4
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    You clearly don’t know what that means. Since Flatpaks do have a mechanism for updating, that statement cannot be a Freudian slip.

    Why are you so mad lmao.

    Flatpak is just a bloated mess, even with deduplication (Gimp increased the size to 4.8 GiB sorry 4.79GIB since I don’t want to mislead people):

    Again with the lies.

    I have 61 flatpaks installed and it totals under 5GiB. HuR dUr FiRefOx fLatPaK usEs 3GiB

    Bro, that is the size of my entire distro with the appimages included (and it also includes the home files), So yeah it is really bad kek.

    Also, here what it actually uses with the suggested tool:

    THAT’S STILL VERY TERRIBLE and more than what 15 appimages use wtf.

      • @Samueru@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        -39 months ago

        Lol you remind me of the people that get mad when someone talks badly about their favorite video game console.

        • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Mate, you’re spreading misinformation about a packaging format and going on all-caps rages about how great the one you use is.

          You’re projecting so hard that I’m considering calling you IMAX.

          • @Samueru@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            -2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Might wanna improve the reading skills there, because I even mentioned here that appimages suck because the runtime doesn’t statically link glibc and that would improve their compatibility to 100% if they did (would work on musl distros).

            going on all-caps rages

            Yeah I can’t take blatantl lies like those that say that appimages bloat the system while promoting flatpaks, and I’ve already shared you enough info showing that is utterly false.

            I’m considering calling you IMAX.

            You’re funny lol.