• Rikudou_Sage
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 months ago

    That apps published there can’t be wrappers around a web application.

    • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      138 months ago

      Good rule, those should be web addresses, not apps. Or even better, native applications rather than web apps, but it does depend on the context.

      • Rikudou_Sage
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Eh… why? More to the point, it’s not mentioned anywhere in their guidelines, it was made up on the spot by the fella doing the code review.

        • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          118 months ago

          They are inefficient and bloated.

          And personally, I prefer good reasoning over good rules. If something comes up that is a bad idea but there’s no existing rule against it, the rules should be changed to address it. As long as the reasoning is sound, I think it’s a good thing, especially when we’re talking about something like a software distribution platform as opposed to say laws that determine freedom or imprisonment.

          • @RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            108 months ago

            Also if you’ve made a web app, let it be installed as a web app. Both FF and Chrome let you install web apps in one click.

          • Rikudou_Sage
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -28 months ago

            Inefficient and bloated describes 90% of all apps I’ve ever seen, regardless of technology used, so I fail to see your point.

      • Rikudou_Sage
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        Not WebView, but a so-called TWA, aka Trusted Web Activity, a features specifically designed to wrap PWAs and give them full-blown app capabilities.

        • @hedgehog@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          What additional capabilities does that give the app beyond using Firefox or Chrome to install it as a PWA?

    • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      If you really want to have it available on F-Droid, you can always put it in a separate repository. So I can see it being annoying that they reject it from their repo, but there’s still a reasonable path forward.

      • Rikudou_Sage
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        Well, I have the app on Google Play store, which was originally meant to be the alternative, now it’s the main store.