GitHub - trytomakeyouprivate/dont-use-appimages: Appimages are an insecure packaging system with very limited use cases. Please use Flatpak instead!
github.com
Appimages are an insecure packaging system with very limited use cases. Please use Flatpak instead! - trytomakeyouprivate/dont-use-appimages

Appimages totally suck, because many developers think they were a real packaging format and support them exclusively.

Their use case is tiny, and in 99% of cases Flatpak is just better.

I could not find a single post or article about all the problems they have, so I wrote this.

This is not about shaming open source contributors. But Appimages are obviously broken, pretty badly maintained, while organizations/companies like Balena, Nextcloud etc. don’t seem to get that.

  • @Pantherina@feddit.deOP
    3•9 months ago

    I want to find a way to do this with flatpaks too.

    A small GUI tool (a statically linked binary lol) that can be placed on that stick

    • copy the flatpak app and runtime stuff to a folder
    • copy the desktop entry over
    • copy app data when chosen

    And the same thing to copy it from the stick to a live system. Should work, probably not haha

    • @smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      4•9 months ago

      TIP: Flatpak have a build-in way for creating USB, check out the “flatpak --help”.

      But the point is with Appimage all that have to be installed is FUSE, which is expected to be installed on most installs when you go to a friend or work where Linux is used.

      • @Pantherina@feddit.deOP
        2•9 months ago

        Oh nice!

        Flatpak also works everywhere and appimages are not ported to fuse3…

        I mean I want to think Appimages where nice, and they are kinda, but no.