Yet another “brilliant” scheme from a cryptobro. Naturally this caused a gold-rush for scammers who outsourced random people via the gig economy to open PRs for this yml file (example)

  • chebra
    link
    fedilink
    010 months ago

    @CrayonRosary having a pull request merged is in no way a proof of ownership of the repo, or a sign that the owner wants to participate in this scheme. There are better ways to prove ownership. It’s relatively easy to slip in some file unnoticed, or falsely explain during the PR process what the file represents. So choosing this way of validation is a huge red flag about the whole scheme. It motivates people to falsely claim ownership of popular repos.

    • @CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      having a pull request merged is in no way a proof of ownership of the repo

      That’s literally what I was saying! That was the entire point of my comment!