Hello! Today I learned about the existence of LibreY, and the project seems very interesting. I was wondering, how does it compare with SearXNG? which one is easier to self host, and which one is lighter on resource usage? Which one gets rate-limited less? I’m particolary interested in opinions of people who used both

Thanks in advance!

    • tubbaduOP
      link
      English
      711 months ago

      Why? The public instances are heavily overloaded, isn’t a private instance faster?

      • @anamethatisnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1911 months ago

        Many use SearXNG to get less personalized search and tracking. If hundreds of users appear as one user for the search engine then both tracking and personalization of the results suffer.

    • Sims
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 months ago

      Hm, I would think users could get good value out grouping search subject and selecting the best engines for their need, and receive a good spread of results from a single search.

      …also, our upcoming swarm of personal AI’s might benefit from such a selfhosted search service.

      • @unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        611 months ago

        The main goal of these projects (SearxNG, Piped, Invidious, Nitter…) is to make it way harder to track users by having thousands of users make requests from one single place. If you host this service just for yourself… you’d get the same tracking as using the service itself.

        Self-hosting just for yourself damages the community a bit because your data will not be used to confuse Google and the other guys.

        • @zaphod@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          That’s a goal, but it’s hardly the only goal.

          My goal is to get a synthesis of search results across multiple engines while eliminating tracking URLs and other garbage. In short it’s a better UX for me first and foremost, and self-hosting allows me to customize that experience and also own uptime/availability. Privacy (through elimination of cookies and browser fingerprinting) is just a convenient side effect.

          That said, on the topic of privacy, it’s absolutely false to say that by self-hosting you get the same effect as using the engines directly. Intermediating my access to those search engines means things like cookies and fingerprinting cannot be used to link my search history to my browsing activity.

          Furthermore, in my case I host SearX on a VPS that’s independent of my broadband connection which means even IP can’t be used to correlate my activity.

        • tubbaduOP
          link
          English
          010 months ago

          Probably stupid question: let’s say I selfhost searxng only for myself: google & Co can track all my searches, but doesn’t they pair all the data to the IP of my server? And because of this, they will not be able to show personalized ads to me, using my laptop. Is this wrong?

            • tubbaduOP
              link
              English
              010 months ago

              And what if the server has a static IP address?

                • tubbaduOP
                  link
                  English
                  010 months ago

                  How is this possible? I mean, how can they connect the searches from the ip of the server with your laptop’s ip?

                  • SayCyberOnceMore
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    210 months ago

                    They only see your public IP address (ie your router), so all devices on the private side will appear to be the same source.

                    So, if your laptop and your server (and anyone else at the same location) are connected to the internet via the same router, then, you’re the same source.