Is asking not to sell data the same as asking not to track it?

  • Blaster M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Unfortunately, the old Do Not Track setting worked on the honor system. Since when have advertisers ever worked on the honor system?

    • @PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      153 months ago

      Once Microsoft enabled it by default in IE/Edge that was the end of it. The whole point was to be an opt-in.

      Ironically it was also used as another data point for fingerprinting users. It was a nice idea in theory but it just wasn’t gonna work.

    • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      They’re the best option available.

      They’re fucking up the reasons why.

      Welcome to every year for the last twenty years.

  • justOnePersistentKbinPlease
    link
    fedilink
    53 months ago

    Its already a bait and switch in that it was only ever a request and I very much doubt any corporate website ever listened to that request.

    • Bezier
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      DNT was useless because you’re only kindly asking to not be tracked. No advertiser respects it, because they don’t have to. It actually has the opposite effect, because another data point just helps them narrow you down for better tracking.

      I don’t like where FF is going, but calling them out for this is disingenuous.

    • Elsie
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 months ago

      Using something that tells ad servers “hey please don’t track me” and have it disabled by default for most browsers is really just another easy fingerprinting mechanism.