• @net00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Sounds convincing, however businesses don’t deserve the benefit of the doubt. For me to trust and support this content again, the investigation of the allegations needs to produce conclusive evidence. The whole quality drama passed to the background after Madison showed up what really went inside LMG

    Either LMG admits wrongdoing and dishes out consequences to those involved, or they present verifiable and damning evidence showing no abuse occurred. Unlike bootlickers at reddit and ltt forums, I don’t side with businesses against people. If you live in this world and not in your mom’s basement you’d understand why.

    If LMG comes out with “we found nothing,” “no conclusions could be made,” or something along those lines without evidence, then fuck them. Not good enough.

    I vote with my wallet (and time), and I won’t deal with more corpo BS while abusing emplpyees. Before any smartasses come here with the usual “you live in society” crap. Yeah I can’t go live in the woods like a hermit to be morally right, but I can sure as hell drop a shit tech yt channel.

    EDIT: taking another look, the second half of the video was more defensive nonsense. Basically claiming they aren’t a twitter sweatshop, they are the victims, and some heavily edited parking loot footage as “proof”

    And the turnover rate is at best a shaky argument, One can argue since it’s mostly guys, they’re not gonna be at the same situation to be bullied, insulted and sexually harassed until leaving. It doesn’t seem the culture will be fixed anytime soon, so I’m just gonna stop wasting more time with it.

    • glibg10b
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      How do you present evidence that it didn’t happen without uploading months of continuous security camera footage?

      I think we should first wait for Madison to provide evidence that it did happen

        • nudny ekscentryk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          ehhh, no; Colin and Taran repeatedly stated they never witnessed sexual abuse or harassment, and they can only confirm current claims are consistent with what she told them before.

    • @h3rm17@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      The burden of proof works the exact opposite way. You make a claim, then you need to support verifiable and damnable evidence. Not the other way around.

      • @net00@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        This isn’t a court trial tbh, and what has come forth from Madison’s side (testimonies, recording, consistency) is more than enough for me to put the ball entirely on LMG’s side.

        No reason to keep giving businesses the benefit of the doubt when in many cases they have every advantage over the situation.

        • @h3rm17@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          -22 years ago

          Oh, sure, I mean, you are definitely free to do and think as you wish. Just pointing out how the burden of proof works, since a lot of people (not necessarily you) do not get how it works. Bertrand Russel, everyone!

        • @Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          -3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          This isn’t a court trial tbh

          So just because it’s not a court trial means we should throw out innocent until proven guilty? The burden of proof is non-negotiable. These ideas have existed for centuries, they aren’t a purely legal framework.

          what has come forth from Madison’s side

          Which is, to be perfectly fair, limited to he-said-she-said which isn’t evidence. It’s just an allegation and very little can be decided from that alone.

          At this point there is exactly zero useful information to actually derive any real decision from.

          • @Default_Defect@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            So just because it’s not a court trial means we should throw out innocent until proven guilty? The burden of proof is non-negotiable. These ideas have existed for centuries, they aren’t a purely legal framework.

            I’m under no obligation to give LMG the benefit of the doubt, if I choose to abstain from watching their content due to the allegations, then that is my prerogative. My choosing to make a decision without proof either way doesn’t harm LMG further than the loss of ad revenue, etc.

            That’s the difference.

  • @threethan@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    They did an okay job of addressing the accuracy issue, but failed to even mention the issues of workplace culture and absurd quotas.

    It does not matter if workers start and stop their shifts at particular time - as strictly required by law - when the amount of work they are expected to do within that time frame is unrealistic.

    Upping the expections for quality, without lowering those for quality, will only make things worse for everyone working there.

    Not to mention it didn’t even touch on the note serious allegations of sexual harassment.

    • papalonian
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I wouldn’t expect any company would address a potential ongoing sexual harassment case via a YouTube video. Especially one that Linus is in.

      “First of all, we didn’t harass female employees, we pestered them.”

    • @unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      but failed to even mention the issues of workplace culture and absurd quotas.

      For my own understanding, was there something that was missing in their content reforms/error handling and workplace culture segments? I think they had mentioned a commitment to reducing frequency, which I understand is a solution to those, no?

  • @z3n0x@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Significantly less cringy than the last one. I’ll give em that. (Although that bar was low)

  • Tek Syndicate surprisingly came out with one of the best takes I’ve seen on this situation. This could be a real damaging moment for LTT, but getting an employee union could address the criticism perfectly.

  • @Nagairius@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    He really needs to take a step back and let Teran do his what they hired him to do. He has stated multiple times that he is no a CEO. he has no actual training or education and it has been showing for years now. Every talking head episode he pushes out like this just seems to dig his legacy further into this hole.

  • @BabaDuda@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    That bit at the start about addressing the people who want to see them fail… ehhh

    I mean, people who actively want to see you fail just because shouldn’t really be engaged with at all tbfh, and if he’s referrring to who I think he’s referring to, then bleah

    Otherwise at least they’re back, let’s see how they improve

    • hanisod
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      Who’s he referring to? What the hell did I miss?

      • @ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -12 years ago

        Apparently the guy from Gamers Network is just a hater, and him bringing up all this stuff that they have to “introspect” over was just him being a dick. I mean, the fans figured he was right enough to throw a shitfit, but he should know better than to criticize Linus. After all, Linux is infallible except when he’s not.

  • @thisfro@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    Still a lot of vague statements… But I really hope they actually do the stuff they say.

    Also nice of him to directly call out abusive community members.

    • 7heoM
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I’m pretty sure they will hear that and be like “damn right! they should be ashamed of themselves.” thinking nothing more of it…

  • @unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    -1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Reading the Reddit thread on this, I find it fascinating that, at the beginning of the incident, Lemmy had more balanced conversations vs the crazies on Reddit calling for LTT disbandment. Now after the latest video, it seems like Reddit seems more reasonable and receptive with Linus’ plans vs Lemmy being the LTT doomsayers.

    • @notepass@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      -12 years ago

      Lemmy somehow went into a deranged rambeling mode after some time. I do not understand why, but I mostly switched over to Reddit after that.

      • @steakmeout@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        You mean literally only calling out Linus repeatedly dodging the waterblock issue and stating that Unionisation would resolve most of the other employee dissatisfaction issues?

        How deranged. Much Ramble.

  • Polar
    link
    fedilink
    -12 years ago

    Wow. Looks like my comments last week about waiting for both sides to speak (which were heavily downvoted) was the correct move.

    You guys are embarrassing. You’re no better than toxic ass Reddit. Even the comments posted here now are ridiculous, like those refusing to watch this video lmao.

    So one sided.

    • @ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      “Mr. Sebastien, in your video from August 26, 2023 marked as exhibit 23B you referred to “the Madison situation”. Can you explain what you meant by ‘situation’?”

      You may not like it but when there’s credible accusations of harassment, constructive dismissal, and possibly up to battery you do not make public statements of any kind beyond, “We are investigating and taking the accusations seriously”, which in case you missed it the CEO of LMG already did a week ago.

    • That cuts both ways. eg: GN didn’t have the decency - while claiming to do journalism - to do a standard journalist thing and approach LMG for comment. This is all I need to know about GN.

        • LMG is 200 odd people. You could say Nvidia with >10k employees is colossal perhaps, or you could say Cisco with >80k is. 200 people is barely a medium sized enterprise. Christ, the company I work for is nearer 2k people.

          And in any of those cases, the size of the entity doesn’t matter - its a very common journalistic practise to seek comment. I tend to think that because GN chose not to, that it veered away from a purely journalistic exercise because they are essentially a competitor. They still have the right to publish it and make the claims they want but it changes the framing of the video quite a bit for me.

          Bear in mind that I think all benchmarking is over hyped in its reliability and importance so pretty much none of that side of things holds any real credibility with me at all - so i’m mostly judging GN based on they way they’ve presented this issue.

          Finally, Linus didn’t sell the startup’s prototype, LMG did. And unless you’re ignoring the whole trail of fact on that its pretty clear it was a stupid mistake but also how that came to be isn’t some evil genius plan.

            • Crazy that although Mr. Beast has old clips of transphobic jokes, Mr. Beast handled Kris coming out fantastic. Linus talked about Emily like Linus was banning the transphobic comments just to keep decorum for the business. Mr. Beast talked about Kris like he was offended that people were insulting his friend.

              If you told me 5 years ago I’d end up liking Mr. Beast and turning away from LTT, I don’t think I would have believed it