• @leopold
    link
    English
    47 months ago

    Amarok uses Qt, just like every other KDE project. Likewise, I don’t think GNOME has any project not using GTK.

      • Aatube
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        @const_void@lemmy.ml UI kit doesn’t necessarily mean good/bad design

        @kde@lemmy.kde.social @kde@floss.social @tsonfeir@lemmy.world @GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml @leopold@lemmy.kde.social

      • @leopold
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        What, the grey bars? Crappy is a rude way of putting it, but yes they look pretty bad. I think that’s probably an artifact from the Qt4 days. It looked fine with Oxygen. Rest looks fine to me. If you think it looks busy, well the screenshot has a lot of panels enabled, just to showcase the features. IIRC many of them are not shown by default and a user would only keep the ones they need, since the interface is customizable.

        • @tsonfeir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          I’m not trying to be “rude.” But the line height, weird font sizes, spacing between elements. Just everything about it screams function over form. There is a way to have both. Most software that adheres to modern design principles have overcome the “janky” UI

          • 高文偉
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            @tsonfeir @leopold I think they’re more focused on fixing build errors and putting out a release for now, and leave UI updates for later. So we’re stuck with the old look for this release.

            • @tsonfeir@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              Whatever you do, don’t say it looks “crappy,” The abusive mods will remove your comment!!

              We can always say positive things in the sub.

              And therefore, this looks about as beautiful and modern as Windows 3.1.