That’s why I didn’t propose an anarchist vision. I do recognize the need for states. Just very very weak ones.
Nation states are a different case altogether though. You can have a multinational state. Sure, it is easier for a state to continue existing if the landmass it controls identifies as a single nation. That helps give it legitimacy.
I’d recommend reading more about nation states and why nations ≠ states.
How about the concept of a nation itself ceases to exist? How about free movement of people, very weak states, consumer cooperatives as the only capital controlling entities who are allowed to buy labor only from worker coops? Economic democracy, competition, choice and so on?
How about a world without kings and non consented rulers, a world where we stop wanting to conquer each other, and instead focus on conquering the limits set on us by nature? How about a world where we build a Dyson swarm, solve interplanetary, interstellar, and dare I say intergalactic travel?
Aight imma go cry myself to sleep now
From what I recall, the reason why they specifically reflect the green is to moderate the amount of sunlight they absorb.
Hence, if plant life exists, around red dwarfs, it is likely to be red in color.
And I’m not dead yet so I guess I’ll be alright
In “Way less sad” by AJR
China isn’t as successful at imperialism as the Americans. The American ruling class is just… Too good at being evil.
Doesn’t mean that China and Russia aren’t imperialist though. They’re just unable to beat the US… For now…
You find that all of your “left” muscles have been paralyzed.
It’s matrices all the way down
The little girl on the left with adult hands… So fkin funny lol
Wow. That’s the spirit of good faith dialog!
You’ve provided no evidence, absolutely nothing. I highly doubt you can even define what “artificial intelligence” actually means. I define it as follows:
“An intelligent system is any system that has a set terminal goal, and that can change its approach to achieve that terminal goal by learning from environmental stimuli.” Hence, most machine learning models qualify as AI according to this definition. The first machine learning model was created in the 20th century.
That being said, you dehumanized me before. That’s not nice. Whatever you say actually affects the person on the other end. I hope you touch grass sometime and learn how to interact with other humans, offline or online. I’m blocking you now. Hope you better.
Employee owned businesses while better than capitalist owned businesses, aren’t the solution imo and the wrong thing to focus on.
Ownership by the “working class” > ownership by the “workers”. This can be established by consumer cooperatives which sadly aren’t referenced enough.
Ah, now if you said that worker coops must be the only institution allowed to sell labor, then I’d definitely agree.
So basically:
I don’t see why AI won’t be ubiquitous in the future. Is the timeline of this future debatable? Yes.
Yeah, saying “everything doesn’t need to learn how to read” is really stupid.
The role of the government is not to decide what is abhorrent and what isn’t. The role of the government is to ensure protection of human rights, provide healthcare, run schools, build infrastructure and so on.
Consenting horny adults being horny with each other and doing horny stuff to each other does not violate any human rights.
The British government can go fuck itself.
Will have to try it out next time. Thank you for the tip 🍆💦
Lol yeah, if you don’t like what you see… Just close your eyes! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
For which office? You guys already have elected progressives in some offices
I wonder what fascinated alien scientists would write about us
Lmao VLC on projected screens reminds me of when my 4th grade teacher was super impressed because I was able to pause the movie played on VLC/close it without using the mouse.
Depends on your definition of “easy”. Here’s the wiki article about it.
My bad. I incorrectly assumed that the above terminologies were common knowledge. I should’ve provided direct links. Well, here they are:
Difference between nations and states
Definition of a “nation-state”
When I talk about nations and states, I talk from the perspective of these definitions. As you can see, they’re not really synonyms. It’s not squabbling about terminologies. If we have a different understanding of what different words mean, then our logical arguments are going to look very different. I’m not saying that your definition is wrong or whatever. I’m just clarifying how I define these terms in my arguments. That way, you can understand what I mean to say.
As for the “questions” you posed… I’m not sure exactly what answers you want me to provide. I already told you that I do believe that states need to exist. We’re in agreement there. I just don’t think that it’s healthy for society to divide itself among different nations. Seems quite a waste of mental space, resources, etc. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯